2020
DOI: 10.24310/innoeduca.2020.v6i2.5601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿Cuánto importa la competencia digital docente? Análisis de los programas de formación inicial docente en Uruguay.

Abstract: El presente artículo presenta el análisis de la inclusión de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) en los programas de formación inicial docente (FID) en Uruguay.  El objetivo es cómo la Competencia Digital Docente (CDD) se incorpora en los programas de los cursos como parte de la formación de estudiantes, en el contexto de implementación de una política educativa pública de inclusión digital en el país. A través del análisis de contenido y bajo la metodología propuesta por Krippendorff (19… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The main contribution of this review lies in its comparison between pre/post-pandemic studies, which show a great increase in the use of technologies in the educational world (across the curriculum), and research work focused on measuring the competencies of these devices (Baber et al, 2022 ). These new investigations have not only followed the line of previous ones but focused on the measurement of digital literacy and its influence on it by variables such as the degree of origin, gender, age, or being a digital native or immigrant (Castañeda-Peña et al, 2015 ; Çoklar et al, 2016 ; Castañeda et al, 2018 ; Ata and Yildirim, 2019 ; Gür et al, 2019 ; Hamutoglu et al, 2019 ; Lerdpornkulrat et al, 2019 ; González et al, 2020 ; Navarro, 2020 ; De Sixte et al, 2021 ). But there has been an expansion of the topics and variables that are studied in conjunction with digital literacy, among which we find as a novelty, the study of psycho-educational variables such as academic motivation (Chow and Wong, 2020 ), self-efficacy and motivation (Lerdpornkulrat et al, 2019 ), effort expectations (Nikou and Aavakare, 2021 ), and self-concept as a student and as a teacher (Yeşilyurt et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contribution of this review lies in its comparison between pre/post-pandemic studies, which show a great increase in the use of technologies in the educational world (across the curriculum), and research work focused on measuring the competencies of these devices (Baber et al, 2022 ). These new investigations have not only followed the line of previous ones but focused on the measurement of digital literacy and its influence on it by variables such as the degree of origin, gender, age, or being a digital native or immigrant (Castañeda-Peña et al, 2015 ; Çoklar et al, 2016 ; Castañeda et al, 2018 ; Ata and Yildirim, 2019 ; Gür et al, 2019 ; Hamutoglu et al, 2019 ; Lerdpornkulrat et al, 2019 ; González et al, 2020 ; Navarro, 2020 ; De Sixte et al, 2021 ). But there has been an expansion of the topics and variables that are studied in conjunction with digital literacy, among which we find as a novelty, the study of psycho-educational variables such as academic motivation (Chow and Wong, 2020 ), self-efficacy and motivation (Lerdpornkulrat et al, 2019 ), effort expectations (Nikou and Aavakare, 2021 ), and self-concept as a student and as a teacher (Yeşilyurt et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las correlaciones significativas identificadas con las variables facultad y carrera resaltan la importancia de los esfuerzos que se realizan en los programas en función de la disparidad en el nivel de desarrollo de la CDD detectado (González et al, 2020). Este descubrimiento destaca la influencia del entorno académico en la configuración de las CD de los profesores, subrayando la necesidad de considerar estos factores al diseñar intervenciones y estrategias de formación.…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…In the Latin American context, there is a need for digitally competent teachers so that they can train their university students to act as responsible digital citizen (Gisbert et al, 2016;INTEF, 2016;Llorente, 2008;Lugo and Ruiz, 2016;Maris et al, 2008;Salinas and Silva, 2014;Selwyn, 2013;Silva et al, 2016;Suárez et al, 2010). In this sense, Morales et al, 2020 has pointed out that the greatest challenge in many of the Latin American countries is that educational institutions sponsored by a national educational public policy include in their teacher training programs, the development of digital competence, its evaluation, and its eventual certification.…”
Section: Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Chou and Peng, 2011;Chou and Chou, 2016;Engen et al, 2015;Shin, 2015). Morales et al (2020) has pointed out the need to deepen the teaching of digital security, as well as the promotion and inclusion of security content in university curricula. It should be noted that this measure has already been implemented in other educational levels, such as: the PIES model (Šimandl and Vaníček, 2017), the CIPA program (Yan, 2009) and the TAIS project (Chou and Peng, 2011).…”
Section: Research Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%