2015
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-92002015000200016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿Cuántos años monitorear el éxito de plantaciones con fines de restauración?: Análisis en relación al micrositio y procedencia de las semillas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Articles dealing only with survival and performance of planted species (e.g. González‐Espinosa et al ; Simoes Macayo & Renison ) were not considered. Similarly, reports of implementation monitoring alone (Block et al ) were also not considered, since this kind of monitoring quantifies changes immediately after treatments, and evaluates whether treatments were done as prescribed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles dealing only with survival and performance of planted species (e.g. González‐Espinosa et al ; Simoes Macayo & Renison ) were not considered. Similarly, reports of implementation monitoring alone (Block et al ) were also not considered, since this kind of monitoring quantifies changes immediately after treatments, and evaluates whether treatments were done as prescribed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…australis sapling was planted at the plot center (age of 6–7 months, height of 3.9 ± 0.1 cm). Trees were watered only at planting, no fertilizers were used, and they were monitored for survival and growth thereafter (Renison et al ; Simoes Macayo & Renison ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En condiciones adversas o con una fuerte presión competitiva, las semillas más grandes pueden tener un éxito superior en el proceso de establecimiento, debido a que ofrecen mayores reservas para el desarrollo de las plántulas (Hendrix et al, 1991;Leishman, 2001;Moles & Westoby, 2004). Los frutos de P. tarapacana fueron ligeramente más pesados (0.0055 g promedio) en comparación con otras especies del género, como el caso de P. australis (peso promedio por semilla de 0.0047 g) (Macayo & Renison, 2015). Posiblemente responde a una estrategia o adaptación a habitar áreas más elevadas (Leishman, 2001;Moles & Westoby, 2004).…”
Section: Peso De Frutos De P Tarapacana En Relación Al Gradiente Alti...unclassified