“…The design and synthesis of porous metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have aroused great attention because of their promising application in a series of regions, such as polytypic catalysis, fluorescence sensing, drug delivery, gas separation/storage, magnetism, optoelectronics, and so on. − Since the first report of MOF-catalyzed cycloaddition by Han et al, there have been a lot of studies on CO 2 cycloaddition catalyzed by various MOFs, which are differentiated by their constituents and connectivities. − In terms of documented references, indium-based organic frameworks (In-OFs) have become a basically reliable heterogeneous catalyst because of the unique traits of In 3+ ion including accessible high-level p orbitals, diverse coordination numbers, and distinctive electronic configurations, which render them the ability to serve as facile Lewis acid sites to activate the involved reactants of CO 2 and epoxides during the chemical conversion of epoxides to cyclocarbonates. − Moreover, in the past few years, zinc-based MOFs (Zn-MOFs) with well-ordered structures or networks are also well developed for a confirmed high catalytic performance on the chemical fixation of CO 2 under mild solvent-free conditions because of their moderate Lewis acidity and affinity to CO 2 and epoxide molecules from 3d 10 zinc cations. − In 2013, Williams et al first reported that heterodinuclear MOF catalysts exhibited evidently higher activity upon the cycloaddition or copolymerization of CO 2 and epoxide than the homodinuclear ones, which might be due to the fact that the combination of chemically dissimilar metals displayed discrepant bimetallic surfaces and a high concentration of regularly distributed Lewis acid sites. − So far, although the coexisting secondary building units (SBUs) of {InM 2 }, {In 2 M 2 }, {In 3 Ln}, and {In 3 Ln 2 } are reported, , the oriented strategy of integrating In 3+ 5p and Zn 2+ 3d metal elements into one SBU as inorganic nodes in MOFs has not yet been explored, maybe because the high and multifarious coordination numbers of In 3+ and Zn 2+ ions facially lead to their incompatibility.…”