2017
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci11423-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) Breeding Line with Young Fruit Resistance to Infection by Phytophthora capsici

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the eight accessions retained for analysis, these two accessions were the only that were not F1 hybrid varieties. One possible explanation for this slight decrease in heritability could be that these two seed sources were partially heterogenous and segregating for disease resistance, as has been observed within open-pollinated accessions of other species (Davis et al 2007; Grumet and Colle 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Of the eight accessions retained for analysis, these two accessions were the only that were not F1 hybrid varieties. One possible explanation for this slight decrease in heritability could be that these two seed sources were partially heterogenous and segregating for disease resistance, as has been observed within open-pollinated accessions of other species (Davis et al 2007; Grumet and Colle 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The source of young fruit resistance was MSU109483-53 ( Grumet and Colle, 2017 ), a breeding line obtained through a series of pure line selections from PI 109483, a landrace collected from Türkiye. Seed from MSU109483-53 was used for doubled haploid (DH) production via in vivo- induced parthenogenic embryo culture generously performed by Rijk Zwaan (De Lier, Netherlands).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them, PI 109483 from Türkiye, exhibited stable resistance in the following generations of selfing. The resulting S 6 progeny was released as a breeding line MSU 109483-53 ( Grumet and Colle, 2017 ). The breeding line was later used for doubled haploid (DH) production, and the DH line ‘A4-3’, which shows delayed and reduced symptoms and slower rate of pathogen growth ( Zhang et al., 2021 ), was used to study young fruit resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three cucumber cultigens were used for these experiments: susceptible pickling cucumber breeding line, “Gy14” (originally obtained from the University of Wisconsin and multiplied in the greenhouse); the slicing cucumber cultivar, “Poinsett 76” (Seedway, LLC, Hall, NY, United States), with age-related resistance (ARR) to P. capsici ; and the doubled haploid breeding line “A4-3,” with moderate young-fruit resistance to P. capsici “A4-3” was derived from breeding line MSU 109483-5-3, a self-pollinated line from cucumber PI109483 ( Grumet and Colle, 2017 ). The doubled haploid line was generously produced by Rijk-Zwaan, Netherlands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fruits of “Poinsett 76,” which exhibits ARR ( Mansfeld et al, 2020 ) were harvested at 8 vs. 16 days post pollination (dpp); 16 dpp fruit were used for comparisons of “Poinsett 76” (ARR+) and “Gy14” (ARRı-). For the comparisons of young fruit from “Gy14” and “A4-3,” trellised plants were grown in the field and pollinated by bees under growing conditions as described by Grumet and Colle (2017) . Once the period of fruit set began, young fruits were harvested at 5–7 dpp as assessed by fruit size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%