1967
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5371(67)80105-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cued recall and free recall as a function of the number of items per cue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DMT assesses ES by using "cue overload" (Watkins, 1979) such that multiple targets are associated with each category cue. Because increasing the number of targets per cue increases task difficulty (Earhard, 1967), Puglisi et al's account of the discrepant findings regarding age and encoding specificity might apply to the present results. This account predicts that age by encoding specificity interactions should be influenced by manipulations of task difficulty, such as the number of targets per cue.…”
Section: A Specific (Nonmediated) Age Deficit In Esmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The DMT assesses ES by using "cue overload" (Watkins, 1979) such that multiple targets are associated with each category cue. Because increasing the number of targets per cue increases task difficulty (Earhard, 1967), Puglisi et al's account of the discrepant findings regarding age and encoding specificity might apply to the present results. This account predicts that age by encoding specificity interactions should be influenced by manipulations of task difficulty, such as the number of targets per cue.…”
Section: A Specific (Nonmediated) Age Deficit In Esmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…because the number of groups present in recall increased with the number of initial groups, and the number of items per recalled group increased with the size of the groups. Earhard (1967) also found no difference in free recall as a function of the number or size of sets into which a list was distributed, although cued recall increased with the number of sets. In the imagery studies reported here and elsewhere (Begg, 1973;Begg & Anderson, 1976), interactive and separate imagery do not differ in total recall.…”
Section: Imagery and Organization 181mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Two factors that influence an item's accessibility are the specific retrieval cues that are available (Thomson & Tulving, 1970;Tulving, 1983) and interference from other items also associated with those retrieval cues (Earhard, 1967; Watkinsthat cue, the target item will be difficult to retrieve. Given these dynamics, one might wonder how retrieval is able to succeed as often as it does.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%