2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13164-018-0425-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cueing Implicit Commitment

Abstract: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, our results suggest that audiences take speakers to be committed to 'what is meant' rather than 'what is said' (see below for comments on the generality of this finding). More broadly our findings align with theories of commitment based on social expectations (e.g., MacCormick & Raz, 1972;Scanlon, 1998;Sugden, 2000; for experimental support see also Bonalumi, Isella, & Michael, 2019), and they speak against theories which argue that commitments derive from conventions and social practices (e.g., Austin, 1962;Rawls, 1971;Searle, 1969).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…In sum, our results suggest that audiences take speakers to be committed to 'what is meant' rather than 'what is said' (see below for comments on the generality of this finding). More broadly our findings align with theories of commitment based on social expectations (e.g., MacCormick & Raz, 1972;Scanlon, 1998;Sugden, 2000; for experimental support see also Bonalumi, Isella, & Michael, 2019), and they speak against theories which argue that commitments derive from conventions and social practices (e.g., Austin, 1962;Rawls, 1971;Searle, 1969).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Subsequent empirical work has supported Michael et al's [52] framework. Bonalumi et al [53] presented scenarios to participants describing existing implicit commitments ( participants take the perspective of a protagonists) and probing their reactions to violations of those commitments. Normative opprobrium and negative emotional reactions were stronger when the protagonist on the receiving end of the violation was described as having invested more effort to maintain their part of the commitment, or when the joint action had been repeated more often.…”
Section: Problems With Philosophical Accounts Of Joint Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research is silent on the process by which joint commitments are achieved. Processes are usually illustrated by the trite armchair examples described in §2, or participants in the studies by Bonalumi et al [53] are asked to make sense imaginary interactions (e.g. text messages to arrange meetings).…”
Section: Joint Commitment As Process: How the Sense Of Commitment Is ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If speakers can signal different degrees to which they are willing to take responsibility for the truth of their messages, and listeners can track these signals, this might support the stabilization of communication. By signaling the extent to which they are ready to bear either direct or reputational consequences in case they are found to be wrong, speakers might allow listeners to gauge how much to rely on the truth of the claim in question (Bonalumi, Isella, & Michael, 2019). In essence, the strength of a speaker's commitment might be viewed as a signal for how much she is willing to "bet" on the truth of her assertion.…”
Section: Speaker Commitment Can Stabilize Human Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%