2020
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/vh4rj
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cues for facial attractiveness and preference of sexual dimorphism: A comparison across five cultures

Abstract: It has been hypothesised that the strength of association between sex typicality and attractiveness follows an adaptive pattern across cultures. Such pattern allows for adjustment of individual preferences for facial cues associated with direct (parenting) and indirect (biological quality) benefits from mating with a potential mate according to environmental conditions. To test this hypothesis, we examined associations among intra-culturally perceived sex typicality, attractiveness, measured skin lightness, me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 150 publications
(222 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies investigating human physical attractiveness include a statement on the stability of attractiveness ratings across ethnicities (“strong cross-cultural agreement”). However, there is concern about the validity of this statement [ 54 , 55 , 80 , 81 ]. The findings of the present study corroborate the presence of differences in the assessment of female facial appearance, depending on the ethnicity of the face and the ethnicity and gender of the assessor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies investigating human physical attractiveness include a statement on the stability of attractiveness ratings across ethnicities (“strong cross-cultural agreement”). However, there is concern about the validity of this statement [ 54 , 55 , 80 , 81 ]. The findings of the present study corroborate the presence of differences in the assessment of female facial appearance, depending on the ethnicity of the face and the ethnicity and gender of the assessor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%