2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.02998.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cuffed vs non‐cuffed endotracheal tubes for pediatric anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Oversized outer tube diameters, inadequately designed cuffs, wrongly positioned or missing depth marks and cuff overinflation have been identified as causes of airway damage in children managed with a cuffed tube. The choice of an optimally sized CETT requires that the inner diameter, as well as the outer diameter, is taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 Oversized outer tube diameters, inadequately designed cuffs, wrongly positioned or missing depth marks and cuff overinflation have been identified as causes of airway damage in children managed with a cuffed tube. The choice of an optimally sized CETT requires that the inner diameter, as well as the outer diameter, is taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Despite these potential problems, UETTs remains popular and with experience, paediatric anaesthetists have learnt to overcome these shortcomings effectively. 16 An oversized UETT exerts undue pressure on the laryngeal structures and causes laryngeal injury. Even if an UETT reasonably seals the trachea and has a leak, the pressure that is exerted on some parts of the cricoid mucosa may still be excessive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por esta razón, no se recomendaba el uso de tubos con cuff en anestesia pediátrica para así evitar la lesión de la mucosa laríngea, manifestada por un espectro de complicaciones, desde estridor hasta secuelas más complejas 4,5,6 . El uso de cuff ofrece múltiples ventajas 7 como un mejor sello y protección de la vía aérea, menor necesidad de cambios de tubos, disminución de la contaminación ambiental por gases anestési-cos, medición más exacta del CO 2 espirado y de los parámetros ventilatorios.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The cuffed tracheal tubes effect on stridor risk, (adjusting for confounders), was non-significant: OR = 2,2; Conf. Interval 95% [0, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]; p = 0,5. Conclusions: The use of cuffed endotracheal tubes did not increase the risk of post-extubation stridor in children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subsequent Intensive Care Society guideline [11] recommends that tracheostomy cuff pressure should be checked regularly with a manometer and kept below 25 cmH 2 O. It is not standard practice to check tracheal tube cuff pressures routinely during anaesthesia [12] despite several studies concluding that this is best practice [13][14][15]. Evaluation of cuff pressures using clinical endpoints, such as palpation or air leak, has been shown to be inaccurate in patients in theatre [14,15], intensive care [10,16,17], and the emergency department [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%