2015
DOI: 10.3856/vol43-issue1-fulltext-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultivo de la trucha cafe anadroma: una nueva alternativa para la diversificacion de la salmonicultura nacional

Abstract: RESUMEN.Con el propósito de aportar información para contribuir al desarrollo del cultivo de la trucha café anádroma (Salmo trutta trutta) en Chile, también llamada seatrout, en este trabajo se revisan los siguientes aspectos: i) características genéticas y origen evolutivo de la trucha café naturalizada existente en el país, ii) rendimiento reproductivo bajo condiciones de cautiverio, and iii) eficiencia del proceso de esmoltificación, tasa de crecimiento y maduración sexual en agua dulce y agua de mar de la … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the different mtDNA markers available, the control region (CR) (or D-loop) has become an ideal marker for characterizing geographical patterns of genetic variation within and between populations since this marker contains many polymorphic sites (Palumbi, 1996). In the case of salmonids, this marker shows high performance for identifying the origins of introduced populations and for assessing genetic variation between wild and introduced populations (Bernatchez et al, 1992;Quinn et al, 1996;Burger et al, 2000;Colihueque, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different mtDNA markers available, the control region (CR) (or D-loop) has become an ideal marker for characterizing geographical patterns of genetic variation within and between populations since this marker contains many polymorphic sites (Palumbi, 1996). In the case of salmonids, this marker shows high performance for identifying the origins of introduced populations and for assessing genetic variation between wild and introduced populations (Bernatchez et al, 1992;Quinn et al, 1996;Burger et al, 2000;Colihueque, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%