Cultural barriers, institutional distance, and spatial spillovers: Evidence from regional industrial evolution in China

Abstract

This study empirically explores the formation of interregional cultural barriers that affect spatial spillovers within the framework of institutional distance based on evidence of regional industrial evolution in China. With dialect as the proxy of culture, this study finds that, first, regional cultural differences will hinder the spatial spillovers of industrial evolution, but the formation of cultural barriers is not only related to culture itself but also closely related to the formal institutional distance between regions. Second, when there is inter‐regional formal institutional distance, formal institutions are insufficient to shape the economic order, and cultural factors with the attributes of informal institutions will become an alternative arrangement to regulate inter‐regional interaction through trust and information mechanisms. The construction of mutual trust based on cultural affinity can reduce the uncertainty of inter‐regional interactions. However, this trust mechanism is regulated by formal institutions and will be significantly weakened with the reduction in formal institutional distance. In addition, information diffusion is easier in regions of cultural homogeneity. However, this information mechanism is often confined to a small social network, and it tends to be weaker as economic society becomes increasingly open and complex.

The Gender Pay Gap in China: Insights from a Discrimination Perspective

“…The level of socio-economic development is clustered across regions in China. That is, the overall similarity in economic, educational, cultural, and industrial structure of neighboring provinces is higher than that of provinces farther away from each other [27,28,29]. If the level of the gender pay gap is influenced by the level of socio-economic development, G (2) is expected to be very small, which means the level of the gender pay gap in neighboring provinces is similar.…”

Intercity innovation collaboration and the role of high-speed rail connections: evidence from Chinese co-patent data

“…MI was developed by the National Economic Research Institute (NERI), an influential think tank in China, and the first MI report was published in 2000. Following Mao and Mao (2021), we calculate the intercity institutional friction (or institutional distance) using the following equation:…”

External Knowledge Linkages and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage: An Examination of Territorial Knowledge Dynamics in China

“…In the same vein, some authors argue that the rapid development of the Chinese economy is the result of collective learning between industries and regions (neighboring regions) [37]. In addition to geographical distance, cultural differences and institutional distance have a significant impact on the evolution of China's regional comparative advantage by affecting the location of knowledge flow [6]. However, less attention has been paid to the impact of multilocational knowledge learning (including proximity and distance learning) on the evolution of China's regional comparative advantage.…”

“…Following earlier work [2], recent studies have focused on the impact of neighboring regions on the evolution of local industries [3][4][5]. Some empirical studies found that when knowledge is disseminated to adjacent regions, it can trigger the evolution of the comparative advantage there [6]. According to Bahar, Hausmann and Hidalgo [3] and Boschma, Martín and Minondo [4], new knowledge of neighboring countries has an important impact on the development of local industries.…”