2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural differences in army ant predation by West African chimpanzees? A comparative study of microecological variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, tool use to gather army ants has been documented in Seringbara, which may be a response to ecological opportunities as army ants are both abundant and widespread across the area [32]. The frequency of opportunities may also be key, as the mere presence of particular ant prey does not provide a sufficient explanation for the observed patterns of chimpanzee tool use [55,56]. It has been suggested that tool use in New Caledonian crows emerged as an evolved adaptation in response to an abundance of embedded food resources for which there were no competitors [22]; importantly, foraging with tools is thought to be energetically highly rewarding, which leads us to examine the relative profitability of tool-assisted versus conventional foraging techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, tool use to gather army ants has been documented in Seringbara, which may be a response to ecological opportunities as army ants are both abundant and widespread across the area [32]. The frequency of opportunities may also be key, as the mere presence of particular ant prey does not provide a sufficient explanation for the observed patterns of chimpanzee tool use [55,56]. It has been suggested that tool use in New Caledonian crows emerged as an evolved adaptation in response to an abundance of embedded food resources for which there were no competitors [22]; importantly, foraging with tools is thought to be energetically highly rewarding, which leads us to examine the relative profitability of tool-assisted versus conventional foraging techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these pioneering efforts provided essential platforms for more refined approaches, some incorporating both genetic and environmental variables into analyses (27). Other advances yielded confirmatory evidence for culture through (i) more focused microhabitat analyses for specific behaviors such as ant-dipping (28,29); (ii) comparisons between neighboring communities sharing genes and habitat properties (30); and (iii) social learning experiments, as for nut-cracking (31,32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other authorities in the field have argued that the habitats of wild chimpanzees are too complex to rule out ecological explanations a priori or without specific empirical data (Galef, 1992;Tomasello, 1999). An intermediate position is that group-specific behavioral differences will always be a product of interactions among ecological, genetic, and social factors (Krüt-zen, van Schaik, & Whiten, 2007;Laland & Janik, 2006, a stance also adopted by recent field studies (Möbius, Boesch, Koops, Matsuzawa, & Humle, 2008;Schöning, Humle, Möbius, & McGrew, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%