2015
DOI: 10.1177/0022022115609146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Differences in Revaluative Attributions

Abstract: Culture can impact cognitive processes, including effects on causal attributions. This study examined cultural differences in revaluative attributions when two potential causes of an outcome are initially present, but new relevant causal information is later available, suggesting potential adjustments could be made with respect to the original judgment. Study 1 (N = 206) found that both Chinese and American participants showed revaluative attributions regarding the target cause when a nontarget cause was decre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further study is needed to examine the relationship between the dynamism of evaluation and Zhang et al’s (2015) static measure of dialectical thinking. Measuring the characteristics of evaluation process is also expected to be useful in distinguishing similar individual differences in cognitive process, such as indecisiveness ( Ng and Hynie, 2014 , 2016 ; Li et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further study is needed to examine the relationship between the dynamism of evaluation and Zhang et al’s (2015) static measure of dialectical thinking. Measuring the characteristics of evaluation process is also expected to be useful in distinguishing similar individual differences in cognitive process, such as indecisiveness ( Ng and Hynie, 2014 , 2016 ; Li et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the Mouse Paradigm, participants also completed the Dialectical Self Scale (DSS), a paper-and-pencil measure of naïve dialecticism in the domain of self-perception ( Spencer-Rodgers et al, 2018a , b ). The DSS has been applied to research in various areas including the self ( Spencer-Rodgers et al, 2004 ; Chen et al, 2006 , 2013 ), personality ( Fetvadjiev et al, 2018a , b ; Na et al, 2020 ), emotions ( Sims et al, 2015 ; Hideg and Kleef, 2017 ; Lu et al, 2017b ), intergroup conflicts ( Lu et al, 2017a , 2020 ), resilience capacity ( Zheng et al, 2020 ), attitudes toward social issues ( Hideg and Ferris, 2017 ; Lee et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2020 ), employee performance ( Bai et al, 2015 ), and causal attributions ( Li et al, 2016 ). The original version in English was translated into Japanese via back translation ( Brislin, 1980 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the influence of positive inter-group contact on cooperation is also moderated by an individual’s cultural orientation, especially by individualism ( Li et al, 2015 ). Considering that cross-strait people, in a general sense, belong to the same traditional collectivistic culture, the major cultural orientation difference between them is individualism, which can be reflected in the “small happiness” culture in Taiwan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%