Cultural factors and the role of privacy concerns in acceptance of government surveillance

Abstract

Though there is a tension between citizens' privacy concerns and their acceptance of government surveillance, there is little systematic research in this space, and less still in a cross cultural context. We address the research gap by modeling the factors that drive public acceptance of government surveillance, and by exploring the influence of national culture. The research involved an online survey of 242 Australian and Sri Lankan residents. Data was analyzed using PLS, revealing that privacy concerns around initial collection of citizens' data influenced levels of acceptance of surveillance in Australia but not Sri Lanka, whereas concerns about secondary use of data did not influence levels of acceptance in either country. These findings suggest that respondents conflate surveillance with the collection of data and may not consider subsequent secondary use. We also investigate cultural differences, finding that societal collectivism and power distance significantly affect the strength of the relationships between privacy concerns and acceptance of surveillance, on the one hand, and adoption of privacy protections, on the other. Our research also considers the role of trust in government, and perceived need for surveillance. Findings are discussed with their implications for theory and practice.

The psychological reassurance effect of mobile tracing apps in Covid-19 Era

“…The less a society trusts its government, the less successful government-led approaches will be and the less the citizens will be reassured. In the context of contact-tracing apps, if citizens perceive benefits from governmental surveillance technologies ( Nam, 2018 ) and if they perceive the legitimacy of the government ( Bradshaw et al, 2021 ), the app could be accepted ( Altmann et al, 2020 ; Thompson et al, 2020 ). Our study demonstrates that the perceived value of the app positively affects trust in government, even if privacy exists.…”

Prediction model for the spread of the COVID-19 outbreak in the global environment

“…Moreover, data can be collected based on self-disclosing, e.g., text-mining from unusual messages ( Ku et al, 2014 ). Notably, this act may violate privacy ( Thompson et al, 2020 ), and it is in the center of public attention in democratic countries ( Ienca and Vayena, 2020 ), and introduces another trade-off – here vs. the value of privacy. The availability of the data in a higher resolution, i.e., in the spatio-temporal space with lower granularity (e.g., street-level instead of country level and/or hourly time intervals instead of daily intervals) may enable the application of our prediction model at a micro-level.…”

Towards explaining user satisfaction with contact tracing mobile applications in a time of pandemic: a text analytics approach

“…In this study, we adopt a broad definition of privacy concerns as "individuals' perceptions of the consequences of sharing information through a CTMA." [29] This definition encompasses privacy concerns regarding the secondary use of data [40]. Privacy concerns can limit the adoption of CTMAs.…”