Cultural features of design and shared learning for safety: A Nordic nuclear industry perspective

Gotcheva, Nadezhda; Oedewald, Pia; Wahlström, Mikael; Macchi, Luigi; Osvalder, Anna‐Lisa; Alm, Håkan

doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.014

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The initiation phase may be negatively affected by unclear definitions or differing opinions regarding the objectives of the project (Ward and Chapman, 1995). There is a need to understand how involvement of diverse and multiple stakeholders, often at different geographical locations, could impact safety, as actors may interpret differently the requirements and related responsibilities (Gotcheva et al, 2016;Gotcheva and Oedewald, 2015). Design has been identified as a significant contributor to recent major accidents, accounting for about fifty percent of accidents and incidents in the aircraft and nuclear industries (Kinnersley and Roelen, 2007).…”

Section: Book Chaptermentioning

confidence: 99%

Governance for Safety in Inter-Organisational Project Networks

Gotcheva¹,

Aaltonen

Kujala

2019

Safety Science Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Book Chaptermentioning

confidence: 99%

Governance for Safety in Inter-Organisational Project Networks

Gotcheva¹,

Aaltonen

Kujala

2019

Safety Science Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Design thinking refers to a shift in organizational culture advocated by practice. Some of the research on the cultural change associated with incorporating design thinking with an organization discusses a user experience orientation (AlHogail, 2015;Gotcheva, Oedewald, Wahlström, & Macchi, 2016;Gruber, Leon & George, n.d.). However, the user experience orientation aligns with the traditional UX maturity model research that supports incorporation of UX practice within an organization and does not address philosophical perspectives regarding end-user data as addressed with the End-User Data…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

User data spectrum theory: Collecting, interpreting, and implementing user data in organizations

Peer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interpreting user data: The act of translating user data collected into design language and/or system requirements. Implementing user data: The act of incorporating user data into the actual design or functionality of the system. Software development process: A structure imposed on the development efforts of software. There are many different types of software development processes, also referred to as lifecycles. Sprint: The basic unit of development in an agile scrum. Usually a sprint is 1 week to 1 month in duration. Usability: "[Usability refers to] the extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use" (International Organization for Standardization, 1998, ISO 9241-11). Usually there are performance and satisfaction measures that quantify the usability of a system. User: "Can be a paying customer, internal employee, physician, call-center operator, automobile driver, cell phone owner, or any person attempting to accomplish some goaltypically with some type of software, website, or machine." (Sauro & Lewis, 2012, p. 9) User-centered design: User-centered design (UCD) is an approach to design that focuses on learning about the people who will use the product. UCD processes incorporate user-centric methods during the planning, design and development of a product. User data: Any data that represent the thoughts, actions, behaviors, words, needs, wants, context, and environments of the end stakeholder(s) interacting with the system. User experience (UX): "A consequence of a user's internal state (predispositions, expectations, needs, motivation, mood, etc.), the characteristics of the designed system (e.g. xii complexity, purpose, usability, functionality, etc.) and the context (or the environment) within which the interaction occurs (e.g. organizational/social setting, meaningfulness of the activity, voluntariness of use, etc.)" (Hassenzahl & Tractinsky, 2006, p. 91-97). User research: "User research is the systematic study of the goals, needs, and capability of users so as to specify design, construction or improvement of tools to benefit how users work and live" (Schumacher, 2010, p. 6). UX capacity: UX capacity is an organization's facility or power to perform UX practices and produce UX results.

show abstract

“…Prevention of occupational injuries is a major issue for non-farm agricultural workplaces . Furthermore, improving workplace safety outcomes requires learning from past incidents, identifying the most significant causes and implementing targeted prevention strategies Gotcheva et al, 2016;. However, obtaining detailed records of past incidents is a challenge acknowledged by investigators across several industrial sectors including agribusiness such as grain elevators and biofuel production (Calvo .…”

Section: Chapter 1 Introduction To Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of workers' compensation claims data for improving safety outcomes in agribusiness industries

Ramaswamy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Cultural features of design and shared learning for safety: A Nordic nuclear industry perspective

Cited by 10 publications

References 39 publications

Governance for Safety in Inter-Organisational Project Networks

Governance for Safety in Inter-Organisational Project Networks

User data spectrum theory: Collecting, interpreting, and implementing user data in organizations

Analysis of workers' compensation claims data for improving safety outcomes in agribusiness industries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About