1998
DOI: 10.1093/alh/10.3.544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Geography and the Place of the Literary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, while literary critics do work with geographical theory, they do not often refer to substantive work on literary texts produced by geographers, and even the key reviews of work in the field are rarely mentioned. Sara Blair's (1998) ‘Cultural Geography and the Place of the Literary’, for example, despite being expressly directed toward the topic of crossover work in geography and literature, cites a wide range of work by geographers and spatial theorists (Lefebvre, for example, Harvey, Massey, Sassen, Soja) but makes no reference to work on literary topics published in geographical journals, not even citing the review articles by Pocock (1981b) and Brosseau (1994). Similarly, Andrew Thacker's article ‘The Idea of a Critical Literary Geography’, published in the same issue of New Formations as Ogborn's review, while it expresses enthusiasm for ‘the growth of a genuinely interdisciplinary field that studies the interface between texts and spaces’, and emphasizes the impact on literary and cultural studies of work by Harvey and Soja, makes no reference to Pocock, Lando, Brosseau, or Sharp (or Blair, working in American literary history, while Thacker is mainly engaging with the UK and European literary modernism).…”
Section: Speaking Across Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while literary critics do work with geographical theory, they do not often refer to substantive work on literary texts produced by geographers, and even the key reviews of work in the field are rarely mentioned. Sara Blair's (1998) ‘Cultural Geography and the Place of the Literary’, for example, despite being expressly directed toward the topic of crossover work in geography and literature, cites a wide range of work by geographers and spatial theorists (Lefebvre, for example, Harvey, Massey, Sassen, Soja) but makes no reference to work on literary topics published in geographical journals, not even citing the review articles by Pocock (1981b) and Brosseau (1994). Similarly, Andrew Thacker's article ‘The Idea of a Critical Literary Geography’, published in the same issue of New Formations as Ogborn's review, while it expresses enthusiasm for ‘the growth of a genuinely interdisciplinary field that studies the interface between texts and spaces’, and emphasizes the impact on literary and cultural studies of work by Harvey and Soja, makes no reference to Pocock, Lando, Brosseau, or Sharp (or Blair, working in American literary history, while Thacker is mainly engaging with the UK and European literary modernism).…”
Section: Speaking Across Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tradition of literary geography can be traced back to the late 19th Century, but the idea flourished in real terms during the 1970s with its interdisciplinary approaches (Singh, 2003). Works of Pocock (1981), Lando (1996), Blair (1998), Hones (2008), and Saunders (2010) have shaped, reshaped, and extended the conception of literary geography since then. And presently, it is emerging as a branch of social science capable of bringing history, geography, and literature studies together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Brian Jarvis’‘Cultural Geography and American Studies’ in the Literature Compass series for an introduction to this key source of spatial studies, as well as Sara Blair’s account in American Literary History of the field’s intervention with literature: ‘Cultural Geography and the Place of the Literary’. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%