“…Thus, while literary critics do work with geographical theory, they do not often refer to substantive work on literary texts produced by geographers, and even the key reviews of work in the field are rarely mentioned. Sara Blair's (1998) ‘Cultural Geography and the Place of the Literary’, for example, despite being expressly directed toward the topic of crossover work in geography and literature, cites a wide range of work by geographers and spatial theorists (Lefebvre, for example, Harvey, Massey, Sassen, Soja) but makes no reference to work on literary topics published in geographical journals, not even citing the review articles by Pocock (1981b) and Brosseau (1994). Similarly, Andrew Thacker's article ‘The Idea of a Critical Literary Geography’, published in the same issue of New Formations as Ogborn's review, while it expresses enthusiasm for ‘the growth of a genuinely interdisciplinary field that studies the interface between texts and spaces’, and emphasizes the impact on literary and cultural studies of work by Harvey and Soja, makes no reference to Pocock, Lando, Brosseau, or Sharp (or Blair, working in American literary history, while Thacker is mainly engaging with the UK and European literary modernism).…”