2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-020-09936-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural heritage and earthquakes: bridging the gap between geophysics, archaeoseismology and engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cultural heritage sites are particularly vulnerable to extreme natural events such as earthquakes and their associated secondary effects such as landslides, ground failures, tsunamis (Pecchioli et al, 2020).…”
Section: Environmental Process 3: Geological-earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cultural heritage sites are particularly vulnerable to extreme natural events such as earthquakes and their associated secondary effects such as landslides, ground failures, tsunamis (Pecchioli et al, 2020).…”
Section: Environmental Process 3: Geological-earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural heritage sites are particularly vulnerable to extreme natural events such as earthquakes and their associated secondary effects such as landslides, ground failures, tsunamis (Pecchioli et al, 2020). The Middle East has one of the best records of historical seismicity in the world, with records extending back more than 2000 years for some areas (Degg & Homan, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent earthquakes in Italy, Turkey, and Greece (e.g., Umbria-Marche 1997, Izmit and Duzce 1999, the central Italy sequence of 2016-2017, and Kos 2017, just to mention few of them) caused the loss of invaluable HAs, pointing to the increasing need for mitigation actions specifically targeted at preserving cultural heritage and cultural landscapes from natural disasters [5]. Targeted measures are not sufficient unless they are coordinated into common disaster risk reduction actions and policies that are capable of harmonizing the contributions of scientists working in different disciplines, policymakers, and a wide spectrum of groups, e.g., professional groups, public bodies, NGOs, and community groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted measures are not sufficient unless they are coordinated into common disaster risk reduction actions and policies that are capable of harmonizing the contributions of scientists working in different disciplines, policymakers, and a wide spectrum of groups, e.g., professional groups, public bodies, NGOs, and community groups. The need for a holistic and participatory approach also applies to the post-disaster recovery and reconstruction of HAs, as the lack of interdisciplinary approaches might lead to severe consequences; as an example, post-disaster recovery and reconstruction after the Calabria (1783), Irpinia (1980), and Belice (1986) earthquakes in Italy ignored the history, memory, and identity of these places and resulted in the definitive abandonment of several villages [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, earthquakes have caused substantial economic damage, estimated for the last forty years at around 135 billion euros, which were used for the restoration and post-event reconstruction [ 5 ]. To this must be added the consequences for the historical, artistic, and monumental heritage [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%