Cultural Heritage Social Value and Community Mapping

Torrieri, Francesca; Oppio, Alessandra; Rossitti, Marco

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_169

Cited by 14 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The first is the inclusion of the individual perceptions, in fact, in the current version of the evaluation model the value functions have been defined by experts. In addition to their opinion, it could be interesting to receive feedbacks from citizens to understand how they really perceive the quality of places (Torrieri et al;2021) and how they would like to implement them. The multidimensional and subjective nature of quality encourages to combine the analysis of the public spaces from a regulatory approach with a constructive one, attentive to the differences between individual attitudes and needs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Il primo è l'inclusione della dimensione percettiva, infatti nell'attuale versione del modello di valutazione, le funzioni di valore sono state definite da esperti. In aggiunta alle loro opinioni, potrebbe essere interessante integrare la percezione degli utenti e le loro preferenze riguardo a un'eventuale azione progettuale (Torrieri et al;2021). La natura multidimensionale e soggettiva della qualità suggerisce la combinazione di un approccio normativo con uno costruttivo per l'analisi degli spazi pubblici in modo tale da includere nella valutazione la varietà delle attitudini e dei bisogni individuali.…”

Section: Conclusioniunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

How to assess urban quality: a spatial multicriteria decision analysis approach [Come valutare la qualità urbana: un approccio di analisi decisionale spaziale multi-criteriale per gli spazi aperti pubblici]

Oppio

Forestiero

Sciacchitano

et al. 2021

Valori E Valutazioni

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From the early 1990s the quality of public space is at the centre of the Agenda of major European cities. Today, more than before, the health emergency due to the Covid-19 pandemy has pointed out the importance of the relationship among public space, quality of life and health. Public and semi-private spaces, especially in high-dense cities and in the most affected areas by Covid-19, represent a strong driver both for restarting and for helping cities to face the new normal age. Despite the advancement of research during the past two decades and empirical evidence about the relationship among quality of open spaces, quality of life and urban sustainability, there is still a lack of studies on how to measure the quality of open spaces. Among the several research lines, the Urban Design approach across its evolution has always focused on it, starting from aesthetic as well as technical issues and increasingly including the social and economic ones. Dai primi degli anni ’90 la qualità dello spazio pubblico è al centro dell’Agenda delle principali città europee. Oggi, più di prima, l’emergenza sanitaria generata dalla pandemia da Covid-19 ha delineato l’importanza delle relazioni tra spazio pubblico, qualità della vita e salute. Gli spazi pubblici e semi-privati, specialmente nelle città densamente popolate e nelle aree più colpite dalla pandemia, sono un elemento chiave da cui ripartire per aiutare le città ad affrontare una nuova normalità e a definire una risposta alle restrizioni sanitarie. Nonostante gli avanzamenti della ricerca scientifica e le evidenze empiriche sulla relazione tra qualità degli spazi aperti, qualità della vita e sostenibilità urbana, pochi sono ancora gli studi su come misurare la qualità degli spazi aperti. Tra le diverse tradizioni di ricerca, l’Urban Design ha sempre prestato una particolare attenzione a questo tema, iniziando con aspetti funzionali ed estetici e includendo nel corso della sua evoluzione anche questioni sociali ed economiche.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Conclusioniunclassified

How to assess urban quality: a spatial multicriteria decision analysis approach [Come valutare la qualità urbana: un approccio di analisi decisionale spaziale multi-criteriale per gli spazi aperti pubblici]

Oppio

Forestiero

Sciacchitano

et al. 2021

Valori E Valutazioni

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…MAVT can be used to address problems involving a finite and discrete set of alternative actions that need to be evaluated on the basis of conflicting objectives. Considering the evaluation of the social value of the historical heritage, Torrieri et al [31] proposed the application of community mapping which is a narrative device of the connections between places and people through a language clear to everyone: drawing. It is a special form of representation based on a participatory process which involves the inhabitants of a given identity in an exercise of selfrepresentation and recognition of local value.…”

Section: Main Methods To Evaluate and Safeguarding Historical Heritagementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Keywords relating to the field of investigation, such as Macael marble and Macael marble columns decay, were entered in these search engines. Following the described procedure, about 80 experts were selected 31 and the questionnaire was sent to each of them by e-mail. Through the analysis of the answers to the questionnaire, the danger index of the exogenous factors with respect to the degradation of the column was quantified in numerical terms 32 , as shown in table 3.…”

Section: Definition Of Columns Vulnerability Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated evaluation methods to hbim for the management of cultural heritage: the case study of the colonnade of patio de Los Leones, Alhambra-Granada

Acampa

Grasso

2022

Valori E Valutazioni

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Historical heritage plays a fundamental role in society. One of the primary targets for European countries is to ensure its safeguarding so that it can be enjoyed by future generations. This paper defines a procedure for the safeguarding of cultural heritage which is often in an advanced state of degradation and threatened by climate change and the increasing number of tourists. The methodology consists of three basic steps: the identification of the technical elements on which intervention is necessary, the assessment of the vulnerability level of these elements considering exogenous factors and the hierarchization of the most vulnerable elements through the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. The case study is the “Patio de los Leones” a world-famous site within the Alhambra and Generalife which every year attracts over 2 million tourists to Granada, Spain. The aim is to set priorities for intervention on the 124 “Macael” marble columns according to the need for restoration. The validation of the methodology and management of the data to achieve the hierarchy among the columns was done using an HBIM model. Il patrimonio storico culturale ha un ruolo fondamentale dal punto di vista sociale. Uno degli obiettivi primari per i paesi europei è quello di garantirne la salvaguardia per consentirne la fruizione alle generazioni future. In questo articolo si definisce una procedura utile alla conservazione di tale patrimonio che spesso verte in condizioni di degrado molto avanzate e che i cambiamenti climatici ed il crescente numero di turisti mettono ulteriormente a rischio. Nello specifico, la metodologia consta di tre passaggi fondamentali: l’individuazione degli elementi tecnici sui quali è necessario un intervento, la valutazione del livello di vulnerabilità di tali elementi tenendo conto dei fattori esogeni e delle caratteristiche morfologiche e di localizzazione, e la gerarchizzazione degli elementi maggiormente vulnerabili attraverso l’applicazione dell’Analytic Hierarchy Process. Il caso applicativo, è il “Patio de los Leones”, sito di fama mondiale all’interno dell’Alhambra e del Generalife, che attira a Granada, in Spagna, oltre 2 milioni di turisti ogni anno. Il fine, nel caso studio, è quello di definire le priorità d’intervento sulle 124 colonne in marmo di “Macael” che necessitano di delicati interventi di restauro. La verifica della metodologia, l’archiviazione e gestione dei dati per giungere alla gerarchizzazione degli interventi di restauro è stata fatta attraverso un modello HBIM

show abstract

“…Efforts are directed towards finding methods for assessing the existential value of many social, historical, and similar aspects of heritage. Torrieri pointed out community maps as a wide-spread participatory tool in the assessment of the social value of cultural heritage (Torrieri et al 2021). However, in the neo-classical utilitarian framework of the economy, with exclusively human beings with innate value, the quantitative expression of the significance of certain historical and cultural value by the cost-benefit analysis method is still questionable.…”

Section: Limitations On the Use Of Economic Analytical Methods In The Evaluation Of Cultural Heritage Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cost–Benefit Analysis in the Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Project Funding

Tišma

Škrtić

Maleković

et al. 2021

JRFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cultural heritage has, for a long time, been considered a source of wealth and well-being for economies. Currently, considerable investments have been allocated for its renewal and maintenance that often surpass the budgets of owners, local communities, and other interested users. Cultural heritage valorisation is expensive and is a great economic challenge. Infrastructural investment, i.e., conservation and restoration, are just one part of the total costs of cultural heritage preservation, while other investments relate to regular operation and maintenance. One of the most difficult decisions for those who design the cultural heritage restoration projects is how to finance them, i.e., what the most efficient financial instruments are for renewal of cultural heritage. These assumptions have instigated interest in the evaluation of services resulting from common good functions of cultural heritage, such as economic, educational, historical, technological, ecological, and climate, as well as tourism and recreational. Therefore, this article starts from the analysis of potential funding sources for cultural heritage through the European Union (EU) funds; a method of economic evaluation of the return on investments and cost–benefit analysis is suggested as a method that should be used in decision making on these interventions.

show abstract

Cultural Heritage Social Value and Community Mapping

Cited by 14 publications

References 17 publications

How to assess urban quality: a spatial multicriteria decision analysis approach [Come valutare la qualità urbana: un approccio di analisi decisionale spaziale multi-criteriale per gli spazi aperti pubblici]

How to assess urban quality: a spatial multicriteria decision analysis approach [Come valutare la qualità urbana: un approccio di analisi decisionale spaziale multi-criteriale per gli spazi aperti pubblici]

Integrated evaluation methods to hbim for the management of cultural heritage: the case study of the colonnade of patio de Los Leones, Alhambra-Granada

Cost–Benefit Analysis in the Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Project Funding

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About