Purpose -This article explores mentoring as a dialogic practice in relation to three themes: identity, fear of being judged and respect. It develops Bokenko and Gantt's (2000) concept of dialogic mentoring to propose a new theorisation of mentoring as a relational, embodied, spatial, affective, and ethical practice. Design/methodology/approach -The article reports on a mentoring project that took place in a UK University which was seeking to enhance its research culture. This project used an innovative methodological approach in which mentor and mentee wrote and shared diary entries as means of building more effective and constructive mentoring experiences, and as a vehicle for reflexively analysing the mentoring process. Findings -The project outcomes were: first, a deepened appreciation and reflexive evaluation of the role played by dairies and writing in the enactment of dialogic mentoring; second, the development of a theoretical framework to enhance understanding of dialogic mentoring; and third, the generation of a dialogic mentoring model encompassing multiple dimensions of the process. Practical implications -The article provides insights to support methodological innovation in mentoring practice; it links mentoring practice with theory development to enhance mentor and mentee collaboration and reflexivity; it offers an example of good mentoring practice that could be scaled up within educational institutions wishing to enhance their research culture. Originality/ value -The article offers, first, a reflexive account of a methodologically innovative mentoring practice to enhance mentoring; and second, it proposes a new theorisation and model of dialogic mentoring practices. Keywords: mentoring; dialogue; reflexive; ethical; higher education Paper type: Research paper
The BeginningThis article is purposefully written in two voices -Lindy, the mentee and Carol, the mentor -to reflect the ongoing nature of the collaborative process we have been engaged in. We have used different fonts to indicate our respective voices.I (Lindy) was seeking a space for research and scholarly development. I had made the decision to leave my post in teacher education because I felt constrained by the pressures of Teacher Standards (which I saw as 'teaching by numbers'), the constant flow of new educational initiatives in schools, and performative Ofsted regimes. I had previously written books for practitioners and wanted to engage in more research