Cultural Integration in Germany

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E S ABSTRACT Cultural Integration in Germany *This chapter investigates the integration processes of immigrants in Germany by comparing certain immigrant groups to natives differentiating by gender and immigrant generation. Indicators which are supposed to capture cultural integration of immigrants are differences in marital behavior as well as language abilities, ethnic identification and religious distribution. A special feature of the available data is information about overall life satisfaction, risk aversion and political interest. These indicators are also presented. All of these indicators are depicted in comparison between natives and immigrants differentiated by ethnic origin, gender and generation. This allows visualization of differences by ethnic groups and development over time. Statements about the cultural integration processes of immigrants are thus possible. Furthermore, economic integration in terms of female labor force participation is presented as an additional feature. Empirical findings suggest that differences among immigrants and between immigrants and Germans do exist and differ significantly by ethnic origin, gender and generation. But differences seem to diminish when we consider the second generations. This indicates greater adaptation to German norms and habits, and thus better cultural, socio-economic and political integration of second generation immigrants in Germany.JEL Classification: F22, J15, J61, Z13

Investing in children’s education: are Muslim immigrants different?

“…When interpreting our results, it should be kept in mind that our empirical study concerns first generation immigrants. As we have already discussed, recent evidence indicates that the second generation of immigrants is less religious relative to the first generation (Constant et al, 2012 -17,699.4 -17,529.5 -16,928.5 -6,552.2 -7,366.4 -2,834.5 Source : survey PRI 2003, authors' calculations.Note: random effects ordered Probit estimates for ordered education. The sample is restricted to children aged 24 and over and having completed their education.…”

“…For instance, more highly educated children of immigrants are expected to achieve better integration and assimilation in the host country, which could, in turn, improve the attitudes of the host country population and even shape more favorable immigration policies (see Algan et al, 2010;Bisin and Verdier, 2011;Constant et al, 2012;Gang and Zimmermann, 2000;Dustmann and Frattini, 2011).…”

The Flux of Transmigrant Identities in Thomas Arslan’sBrothers and Sisters

“…With its second largest immigrant population in Europe (see : Constant, Nottmeyer and Zimmermann 2012), Germany currently raises the third generation of Turkish diaspora that make up almost half of the immigrant community of the country (see Cox 2011). Because, according to Merkel, the Turkish minority is incapable of integrating into the German society, they form a segregated class within the social structure of the country.…”

Do ethnic minorities “stretch” their time? UK household evidence on multitasking

“…Economic integration goes hand-in-hand with social or cultural integration Constant, Nottmeyer and Zimmermann 2009). Ethnic and cultural identity was found to influence labor market behavior in a number of recent studies (see, for example, Battu and Zenou 2010;Constant and Zimmermann 2008).…”