APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 1: Attitudes and Social Cognition. 2015
DOI: 10.1037/14341-014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural psychology.

Abstract: Book-length treatments of recent research on culture include Kitayama and Cohen (2007) and Matsumoto (2001). Excellent undergraduate textbooks on the subject include Chiu and Hong (2006); P. Smith, Bond, and Kagitcibasi (2006); and Heine (2011), with the latter being most comprehensive. An annotated bibliography of readings in cultural psychology can be found in D. Cohen (2011).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 282 publications
(365 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, one of the most critical complaints of cross-national trait research is the systematic distortion imposed by the frameof-reference effect (Schmit et al 1995), also known as the reference-group effect (Heine et al 2002(Heine et al , 2008Peng et al 1997), in which respondents produce self-ratings relative to others in their culture, not relative to a heuristically intangible globalmean(PeruginiandRichetin2007).Validity,ofcourse, is a relative concept, such that a test can be valid for one application but not another. In this case, as per the frame-ofreference effect, trait measures produce valid within-group comparisons,butinvalidbetween-groupcomparisons (Heine et al 2008;van de Vijver and Leung 2001;Cohen 2007). Cross-national misapplication therefore produces misleading data (Ashton 2007).…”
Section: Latitudinal Variation In Conscientiousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, one of the most critical complaints of cross-national trait research is the systematic distortion imposed by the frameof-reference effect (Schmit et al 1995), also known as the reference-group effect (Heine et al 2002(Heine et al , 2008Peng et al 1997), in which respondents produce self-ratings relative to others in their culture, not relative to a heuristically intangible globalmean(PeruginiandRichetin2007).Validity,ofcourse, is a relative concept, such that a test can be valid for one application but not another. In this case, as per the frame-ofreference effect, trait measures produce valid within-group comparisons,butinvalidbetween-groupcomparisons (Heine et al 2008;van de Vijver and Leung 2001;Cohen 2007). Cross-national misapplication therefore produces misleading data (Ashton 2007).…”
Section: Latitudinal Variation In Conscientiousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the obsessive traits of time urgency and future-oriented thought, as well as parsimony and conservation of resources, appear to positively correlate with latitude (Hertler 2015c). Cross-national comparisons of self-reported conscientiousness correlates negatively with latitude, though, as reviewed, this data is open to several explanations, ranging from negation (Heine et al 2008;van de Vijver and Leung 2001;Cohen 2007) to inverse interpretation (Hertler 2015c). Clearly, more data is wanting.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the context of food preferences and consumption patterns, social identity theory provides insights into how cultural affiliations and group memberships influence individuals' dietary choices and behaviors. People often use food as a marker of social identity, expressing their cultural heritage, values, and belonging through food choices and eating practices (Cohen, 2015). By understanding the role of social identity in shaping food preferences, researchers can elucidate how cultural norms, peer influences, and social comparisons impact individuals' dietary behaviors within different cultural contexts.…”
Section: Social Identity Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%