2006
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.2006.266.01.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural soilscapes

Abstract: While soil is normally studied as the outcome of natural geological and chemical processes, soil research by archaeologists, geographers and other social scientists focuses on the human behavioural dimensions of soil formation. As a result, 'cultural soilscape' is an analytical concept common to both Earth and social sciences that encourages a more holistic, transdisciplinary approach to studying soil formation processes. This paper introduces the concept of cultural soilscape and reviews important archaeologi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Dominati et al (2010b) argue that social and esteem needs cannot be fulfilled by soil services, because these needs are based solely on humans' self-perception of emotionallybased relationships with other human beings (or even animals). However, one could easily argue, as a number of authors have done (Boivin and Owoc, 2004;Wells, 2006;Salisbury, 2012), that, on the contrary, soil cultural services, in and of themselves or as part of a broader connection between humans and land or landscape, contribute strongly to the strengthening of a sense of individual and community identity, as well as of well-being among people (e.g., Tengberg et al, 2012).…”
Section: From Properties and Processes To Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Dominati et al (2010b) argue that social and esteem needs cannot be fulfilled by soil services, because these needs are based solely on humans' self-perception of emotionallybased relationships with other human beings (or even animals). However, one could easily argue, as a number of authors have done (Boivin and Owoc, 2004;Wells, 2006;Salisbury, 2012), that, on the contrary, soil cultural services, in and of themselves or as part of a broader connection between humans and land or landscape, contribute strongly to the strengthening of a sense of individual and community identity, as well as of well-being among people (e.g., Tengberg et al, 2012).…”
Section: From Properties and Processes To Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers must do more than simply identify anthropogenic processes; they must also recognize that ''soil is a manifestation of social history, an embodiment of social dynamics'' (Swidler, 2009, p. 7). In short, we must examine both ''soil memory'' (Targulian and Goryachkin, 2004;Wells, 2006) -the materially encoded physical, chemical, and biological effects of human activity -and the social processes and relations underwriting such activity. This is precisely the kind of work that a CPG of soil Pb might help us with.…”
Section: Urban Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These signatures are the result of spatially and temporally variable geomorphic, pedogenic and cultural processes, all of them defining distinct cultural soilscapes (Wells, 2006). Cultural soilscapes represent an important analytical domain, yet not deeply explored in drylands, which can reveal the complex temporal relationships between soil bodies and the consequences of human behaviour.…”
Section: Cultural Soilscapes Of North Gujaratmentioning
confidence: 99%