Cultural variations in the understanding of traumatic brain injury and brain injury rehabilitation

Abstract

Little is known about how people from different cultures experience and understand traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the process of brain injury rehabilitation. The Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit (BIRU) undertook a qualitative project to research cultural variations in the understanding of TBI and the rehabilitation process, interviewing 39 people with TBI and family members from Italian, Lebanese and Vietnamese backgrounds. The focus was on the reporting of sequelae of the TBI; valued qualities of service providers; barriers to effective communication; the role of the families in the rehabilitation process; and the experience of social stigma. Findings suggest there is a universal experience of TBI that transcends individual cultures. Study participants valued attentiveness, friendliness and guidance from rehabilitation staff. Family support was not always available to the person with TBI due to family conflict. Generally, people with TBI and family members valued the assistance of health interpreters facilitating their communication with rehabilitation staff. People with TBI from all three cultures experienced problems of stigma and social isolation. The findings have a number of implications for how brain injury rehabilitation staff can approach service provision to people from diverse cultural backgrounds.

Google Calendar: A single case experimental design study of a man with severe memory problems

“…The study confirms that an aid should be in keeping with a particular individual's lifestyle, convey their desired self-image and fit their value systems (Baldwin et al, 2011 ; Bender Pape, Kim & Weiner, 2002 ). Cultural implications may be important as brain injury may incite feelings of individual and familial shame (Simpson, Mohr, & Redman, 2000 ; Watanabe, Shiel, McLellan, Kurihara, & Hayashi, 2001 ). The mechanism of injury may also be important, e.g., for JA, the fact that he experienced an assault may have led to a general mistrust of others and influenced his perception of negative social evaluation (Riley, Brennan, & Powell, 2004 ).…”

Risk of Violent Crime in Individuals with Epilepsy and Traumatic Brain Injury: A 35-Year Swedish Population Study

“…First, considerable stigma is associated with epilepsy [20] and traumatic brain injury [21], and accurate information on risk for adverse outcomes could be relevant in addressing this. Second, it may provide information on mechanisms underlying violence, assisting the understanding of the neurobiological basis of violent behaviour.…”

‘Lonely in my head’: The experiences of loneliness in individuals with brain injury

“…The majority of evidence about the consequences and motivations associated with concealment of an ABI is qualitative in nature. Participants cited concerns about the reactions of others (anticipated stigma), and their sense of shame and embarrassment (internalized stigma) as reasons for concealing information about their ABI (Shortland & Douglas, 2010;Simpson, Mohr, & Redman, 2000). In relation to the consequences of this concealment, participants from previous studies outlined that concealment and threat of exposure lead to stress in social situations (Crisp, 1993;Hagger and Riley, 2019), and that concealment can be a barrier in friend formation and maintenance, social anxiety, loneliness, and lower self-esteem (Hagger and Riley, 2019;Shortland & Douglas, 2010).…”