Culturally Relevant Model Program to Prevent and Reduce Agricultural Injuries

Helitzer, Deborah; Hathorn, Gary; Benally, Jeannie; Ortega, Catherine

doi:10.13031/jash.20.10333

Cited by 7 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of these 36 studies, a number of 12 studies focused on farm-induced diseases such as prevention of zoonosis [36][37][38][39][40], asthma [41][42][43], skin cancer [44], hearing loss [45], and good manufacturing practices for prevention of antimicrobial resistance [46] and microbiological contamination [47]. A number of two studies focused on agricultural health promotion [48,49] and 23 studies focused on accident and injury prevention concerning pesticide safety [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] and injury prevention among farmers [65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. The years of publication varied from 1996 [44] to 2018 [63].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The years of publication varied from 1996 [44] to 2018 [63]. Eighteen articles presented research performed in North America (16 in USA) [42][43][44][45]51,53,54,59,61,[64][65][66][67][68][69][70], one in Canada [38], and one in Nicaragua [60]); eight articles presented research performed in Asia (three in Thailand [62,63,71], two in India [52,57], one in Laos [37], one in Cambodia [39], and one in Vietnam [40]); four articles presented research from South America (two from Ecuador [55,58], one from Bolivia [56], and one from Brazil [47]); three articles presented research from Africa (two from Tanzania [36,46] and one from Egypt [50]); two articles were from Australia [48,49], and one from Europe [41]. Of the studies considered for the review, six had used an RCT as a study design [36,39,61,63,64,69], 20 used a pre-post with control group…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From the studies included in this review, four had a weak methodological quality [47,53,57,65], 19 had a moderate methodological quality [38,[40][41][42][44][45][46][50][51][52][54][55][56]58,61,63,64,69,71], and 13 had a strong methodological quality [36,39,43,48,49,59,60,62,[66][67][68]70]. None of the studies received a score indicating a very strong methodological quality, since none of them produced results that were generalizable.…”

Section: Study Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 15 studies targeting pesticide safety, most had been performed in North America [51,53,54,[59][60][61]64], followed by Asia [52,57,62,63], South America [55,56,58] and Africa [50]. The crops that were involved were strawberries [64], rice [62], maize [60], dairy products [61], alfalfa and Indian white corn [59], and cotton [57], whereas for nine studies the type of crop was not mentioned in the publication [50][51][52][53][54][55][56]58,63]. The number of participants involved in the studies varied between 50 [57] and 1200 [60].…”

Section: Studies Focusing On Accident and Injury Preventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the latter, two focused on migrant families [53,54]. With regard to the study design, three studies used an RCT [61,63,64], six studies used a pre-post comparison without a control group [50,52,54,55,57,58], and six studies used a pre-post comparison with a control group [51,53,56,59,60,62]. From the pre-post study designs, one study applied a random selection of participants and random assignment to intervention and control groups [62], while two studies randomly selected the villages for the intervention [50,52], and the other ones used convenience samples.…”

Section: Studies Focusing On Accident and Injury Preventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Educational Interventions to Improve Safety and Health Literacy Among Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review

Coman

Marcu

Cherecheș

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Health and safety education for farmers has the potential to increase the level of health, safety literacy, and thereby improve farmers' health and quality of life. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the published literature documenting different educational interventions for agricultural workers that have the improvement of health and/or safety literacy as an outcome. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus and PsycINFO databases for articles focusing on educational interventions for farmers' health and safety. From the 3357 initial hits, 36 unduplicated records met the inclusion criteria. The articles included in the review used educational interventions for farmers with the purpose of preventing farm-induced diseases and injuries, increasing the health and well-being of farmers, and promoting good manufacturing practices. The educational approaches considered varied from lectures, videos, newsletters, games, and community fairs, to involving the community in designing the intervention and training farmers to deliver the intervention to the community. Interventions that used evidence-based theories, which took into account cultural aspects and individual factors, used biomarkers as a behavior change measurement, and involved the community in the development of the intervention had the best results in terms of behavior change. The strategies of educational interventions identified in this review that produced good results have the potential to inform future researchers and policy makers in the design and implementation of public health interventions, programs and policies to improve the health of farmers and their families.Out of the three strategies mentioned, education aims to increase farmers' health and safety by encouraging them to adopt health-enhancing behaviors. To achieve this, education not only tries to enhance knowledge, but also skills, attitudes and practices that serve to prevent accidents and maintain good health. While the effects of health and safety education are often measured by distal outcomes such as injury and disease prevalence, a more direct outcome of health education is health literacy [5,6]. Health literacy is defined as the competence of individuals and communities to access, understand, appraise and apply information that is relevant to take decisions regarding one's health [6]. A related notion is safety literacy, which can be viewed as a content-specific form of literacy in a health context that focuses on the safety of the patient/worker [5,7,8]. A number of studies have shown that low health and safety literacy is a problem not only among the general population, but also among underserved populations [9][10][11][12]. Lower levels of health literacy are linked with low levels of education and literacy, and overall poorer health outcomes [13]. As such, education has the potential of improving general literacy levels as well as health literacy and safety literacy, and ultimately of leading to a better health and quality of life [14].Heal...

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Studies Focusing On Accident and Injury Preventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Studies Focusing On Accident and Injury Preventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Educational Interventions to Improve Safety and Health Literacy Among Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review

Coman

Marcu

Cherecheș

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review

Dyreborg

Lipscomb

Nielsen

et al. 2022

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Limited knowledge regarding the relative effectiveness of workplace accident prevention approaches creates barriers to informed decision‐making by policy makers, public health practitioners, workplace, and worker advocates. Objectives The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of broad categories of safety interventions in preventing accidents at work. The review aims to compare effects of safety interventions to no intervention, usual activities, or alternative intervention, and if possible, to examine which constituent components of safety intervention programs contribute more strongly to preventing accidents at work in a given setting or context. Date Sources Studies were identified through electronic bibliographic searches, government policy databanks, and Internet search engines. The last search was carried out on July 9, 2015. Gray literature were identified by searching OSH ROM and Google. No language or date restrictions were applied. Searches done between February and July of 2015 included PubMed (1966), Embase (1980), CINAHL (1981), OSH ROM (NIOSHTIC 1977, HSELINE 1977, CIS‐DOC 1974), PsycINFO (1806), EconLit (1969), Web of Science (1969), and ProQuest (1861); dates represent initial availability of each database. Websites of pertinent institutions (NIOSH, Perosh) were also searched. Study Eligibility Criteria, Participants, and Interventions Included studies had to focus on accidents at work, include an evaluation of a safety intervention, and have used injuries at work, or a relevant proxy, as an outcome measure. Experimental, quasi‐experimental, and observational study designs were utilized, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled before and after (CBA) studies, and observational designs using serial measures (interrupted time series, retrospective cohort designs, and before and after studies using multiple measures). Interventions were classified by approach at the individual or group level, and broad categories based on the prevention approach including modification of: Attitudes (through information and persuasive campaign messaging). Behaviors (through training, incentives, goal setting, feedback/coaching). Physiological condition (by physical training). Climate/norms/culture (by coaching, feedback, modification of safety management/leadership). Structural conditions (including physical environment, engineering, legislation and enforcement, sectorial‐level norms). When combined approaches were used, interventions were termed “multifaceted,” and when an approach(es) is applied to more than one organizational level (e.g., individual, group, and/or organization), it is termed “across levels.” Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods Narrative report review captured industry (NACE), work setting, participant characteristics, theoretical basis for approach, intervention fidelity, research design, risk of bias, contextual detail, outcomes measures and results. Additional items were extracted for studies with serial measures including approaches to i...

show abstract

The effectiveness of educational interventions aimed at agricultural workers’ knowledge, behaviour, and risk perception for reducing the risk of pesticide exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ayaz

Öncel

Karadağ

2022

Int Arch Occup Environ Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Culturally Relevant Model Program to Prevent and Reduce Agricultural Injuries

Abstract: Limited research has explored pesticide injury prevention among American Indian farmers. In a five-year agricultural intervention, a university-community partnership, including the

Cited by 7 publications

References 59 publications

Educational Interventions to Improve Safety and Health Literacy Among Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review

Educational Interventions to Improve Safety and Health Literacy Among Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review

Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review

The effectiveness of educational interventions aimed at agricultural workers’ knowledge, behaviour, and risk perception for reducing the risk of pesticide exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About