2017
DOI: 10.1177/016146811711900104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culturally Relevant Pedagogy 20 Years Later: Progress or Pontificating? What Have We Learned, and Where Do We Go?

Abstract: Background/Context In this paper, the authors discuss the concept of culturally relevant pedagogy 20 years after its introduction to the professional literature. Purpose/Focus The authors discuss key tenets of culturally relevant pedagogy, examine empirical examples of it, and make recommendations on how the concept may inform and influence the outcomes of culturally diverse students.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, agendas toward White and middle-class norms, propagated by misinterpretations of CRP and other asset pedagogies, have led to a static understanding of culture and an oversimplification of asset pedagogies (Paris, 2012). CRP has maintained its popularity in educational contexts, even as Ladson-Billings (2014) and others have recognized that further revisions are needed in response to shifting educational and sociocultural landscapes and the deepening of neoliberalism's influence in public education (e.g., T. C. Howard & Rodriguez-Minkoff, 2017;Royal & Gibson, 2017). Given that Paris's critiques do not challenge CRP's fundamental merit, but rather its evolution and practical application, realizing the potentials of CRP remains a worthy pursuit.…”
Section: Asset Pedagogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, agendas toward White and middle-class norms, propagated by misinterpretations of CRP and other asset pedagogies, have led to a static understanding of culture and an oversimplification of asset pedagogies (Paris, 2012). CRP has maintained its popularity in educational contexts, even as Ladson-Billings (2014) and others have recognized that further revisions are needed in response to shifting educational and sociocultural landscapes and the deepening of neoliberalism's influence in public education (e.g., T. C. Howard & Rodriguez-Minkoff, 2017;Royal & Gibson, 2017). Given that Paris's critiques do not challenge CRP's fundamental merit, but rather its evolution and practical application, realizing the potentials of CRP remains a worthy pursuit.…”
Section: Asset Pedagogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culturally relevant pedagogy is a rich theoretical framework that continues to evolve and inform teaching, teacher education, curriculum development, and educational research (Howard & Rodriguez-Minkoff, 2017; Ladson-Billings, 2014; Milner, 2017). What is fundamental and enduring in the framework is the goal of empowering students to engage in critical examinations of existing social conditions and how those conditions are or are not congruent with a multicultural and democratic society.…”
Section: Culturally Relevant Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally articulated by Ladson-Billings (1994, 1995a, 1995b, 2014), culturally relevant pedagogy has been elaborated upon by researchers and scholars who seek to describe that framework in increasingly specific theoretical terms (e.g., Brown-Jeffy & Cooper, 2011; Gay, 2010, 2013, 2014; Howard & Rodriguez-Minkoff, 2017; Milner, 2017; Paris, 2012; Paris & Salim, 2014; Seriki & Brown, 2017) and provide examples of how the framework is operationalized (e.g., Aronson & Laughter, 2016; Milner, 2017; Morrison, Robbins, & Rose, 2008; Sleeter, 2012) to document its enduring relevance and importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our purpose was not to study Gay’s (2000, 2010) culturally responsive pedagogy and Ladson-Billings’ CRT but to focus on the program’s use of Ladson-Billings’ CRT framework, recognizing that PSTs heard the term culturally responsive pedagogy throughout their development. We recognize that theoretically, CRT and culturally responsive teaching have been assessed to have potentially important distinctions; however, according to Howard and Rodriguez-Minkoff (2017), the significant overlap in the construction of these frameworks that drive toward similar aims is more salient for research purposes than the nuances.…”
Section: Crtmentioning
confidence: 99%