We are excited to introduce the special issue on equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in the International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. Although overdue, this issue demonstrates a contemporary commitment to prioritizing diverse scholarship and under-represented scholars. EDI is ultimately a best practice that aims to remove barriers, optimize fairness, and ensure our discipline is responsive to the needs of all communities. There are still many gaps in forensic knowledge and practice when working crossculturally and with historically marginalized populations. This special issue is intended to expand our understanding of EDI issues in our field and prompt us to reflect on our shortcomings and biases, with the hope that such work will be regularly integrated into future issues of the journal.Historically, limited research has been available to inform clinical and forensic practitioners seeking guidance when working with diverse clients. Approaches taken when working with ethnic and racial minorities would vary widely, and there were no established directions or guidelines. Those seeking assistance from scholarship would turn to other fields, such as trans-cultural psychiatry, cross-cultural psychology, public health, or medical anthropology, to learn about diverse consumer needs and evidence-based practice. It was incumbent on the individual practitioner to translate this information to forensic and correctional settings, sometimes within mono-cultural systems inflexible to change.The clinical forensic literature has also seldom prioritized issues of diversity. This was arguably due to the lack of diversity within the field itself, which is still a problem in need of work. However, over the