Language, Music, and the Brain 2013
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262018104.003.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture and Evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although an isochronous, external pulse affording entrainment of motor behaviour and inter-individual synchronization may be considered a specialization of music (Cross et al, 2013;Cross & Woodruff, 2009) Expected results concerning incidental memory, similarity to, and prosocial behaviours towards the SP were not replicated. Differently from previous studies, there were no parallel conditions with no-synchronization because the present experiment aimed to address novel dimensions (rather than reproduce the synchrony/no-synchrony effects).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although an isochronous, external pulse affording entrainment of motor behaviour and inter-individual synchronization may be considered a specialization of music (Cross et al, 2013;Cross & Woodruff, 2009) Expected results concerning incidental memory, similarity to, and prosocial behaviours towards the SP were not replicated. Differently from previous studies, there were no parallel conditions with no-synchronization because the present experiment aimed to address novel dimensions (rather than reproduce the synchrony/no-synchrony effects).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition to the more nuanced music-user profile reported in the above literature, women's ancestral background is deeply rooted in species-specific behaviours such as infant-directed speech and music more broadly associated with caring experiences (Cross et al, 2013;Falk, 2004;Lewis, 2009Lewis, , 2013Trehub, Becker & Morley, 2015). Cross and Woodruff (2009) The naturalistic ambition of the present study was limited by the use of…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If vocal phrases were remembered better when produced with discretised pitches, why do humans not sing all the time? Focusing just on pitch in speech and song, one could argue that speech prosody functions primarily in a context of temporal proximity, for example in a turn-taking context that is more typical of speech than music (Cross et al, 2013 ). This might make exact reproduction of pitch unnecessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Music and speech reflect fundamental aspects of human capacities (Juslin and Laukka, 2003 ; Patel, 2008 ). The parallels between music and speech have been attracting scholarly interest for a long period (Fonagy and Magdics, 1963 ; Sundberg, 1982 ; Scherer, 1995 ), with attempts to compare the two from a wide range of perspectives: prosody (Scherer, 1995 ), semantics (Seifert et al, 2013 ), syntax (Lerdahl, 2013 ), evolution (Cross et al, 2013 ), neurocognitive mechanisms (Steinbeis and Koelsch, 2008 ), and facial expressions (Carlo and Guaitella, 2004 ; Livingstone et al, in press ). Particularly, an increasing amount of attention has been given to using perceptual tests for acoustic comparisons between affective music and speech, as they are two important means of emotion communication (Buck, 1984 ; Wilson, 1994 ; Juslin and Laukka, 2003 ) which is crucial for maintaining social bonds in human society (Ekman, 1992 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%