2004
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.59.5.325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture and Intelligence.

Abstract: ABSTRACT:This paper discusses the relationship between culture and intelligence. This paper mainly describes that intelligence cannot fully or even meaningfully be understood outside its cultural context. Behavior that is considered intelligent in one culture may be considered unintelligent in another culture, and so on. Moreover, people in different cultures have different implicit theories of intelligence, so may not even mean the same thing by the word. The relationships between different aspects of intelli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
223
0
20

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(247 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
4
223
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the limitations described in the first comparative FIT-choice study analysing data collected in Australia, the US, Germany and Norway Furthermore, in relation to methodological challenges, Klassen et al (2011) highlight the risk that important cultural differences or similarities may be masked in purely quantitative approaches to cross-cultural teacher motivation research due to restricted definitions and/or unexamined assumptions about pre-service teachers' motivations leading to western-dominated understandings of motivation in non-western settings (Klassen, 2004;Sternberg, 2004). The researchers advocate mixed-methods or qualitative approaches to teacher motivation research, which allow for inquiry into culture-specific factors that might not have been considered in the creation of scales in any original setting.…”
Section: Backgrounds a Multi-dimensional Mixed-methods National Stumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the limitations described in the first comparative FIT-choice study analysing data collected in Australia, the US, Germany and Norway Furthermore, in relation to methodological challenges, Klassen et al (2011) highlight the risk that important cultural differences or similarities may be masked in purely quantitative approaches to cross-cultural teacher motivation research due to restricted definitions and/or unexamined assumptions about pre-service teachers' motivations leading to western-dominated understandings of motivation in non-western settings (Klassen, 2004;Sternberg, 2004). The researchers advocate mixed-methods or qualitative approaches to teacher motivation research, which allow for inquiry into culture-specific factors that might not have been considered in the creation of scales in any original setting.…”
Section: Backgrounds a Multi-dimensional Mixed-methods National Stumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this argument the association between IQ score and other indices of personal success should be diminished in non-Western countries. There is a substantial body of evidence showing that this does occur (Sternberg, 2004): Indeed, conceptions of success, as well as those of intelligence, vary across cultures. The types of success that matter so much in the United States, such as money, may simply have less value elsewhere.…”
Section: Objections Based On Applications Of the Logic Of Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several risk factors have been associated with differences in cognitive functioning, such lesion level (Argento et al, 2011;Fulton & Yeates, 2010), number of shunt revisions (Barf et al, 2003;Brown et al, 2008;Hetherington et al, 2006), a history of seizures (Barf et al, 2003;Brown et al, 2008), age (Wills, 1993), ethnicity (Fletcher et al, 2008;Sattler, 2008;Sternberg, 2004), and SES (McLoyd, 1998;Swartwout, Garnaat, Myszka, Fletcher, & Dennis, 2010). These factors were hypothesized to Neuropsychological profiles of children with SBM 805 predict group membership, such that clusters 2 and 4 would have more biological risk factors than clusters 1 and 3; and clusters 1 and 2 would have more advantageous environmental factors than clusters 3 and 4 (hypothesis 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%