2004
DOI: 10.1057/9780230509818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture and Positioning as Determinants of Strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is further complicated by corporate values, which by their nature are symbolic . The core values that are attributed to a firm's success (often filling the pages of MBA case studies) make up the very assumptions management work from (Ellson 2004) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is further complicated by corporate values, which by their nature are symbolic . The core values that are attributed to a firm's success (often filling the pages of MBA case studies) make up the very assumptions management work from (Ellson 2004) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2000), where values can differ from what a firm assumes as normal in the West (Humphrey 2007) . Business culture influences assumptions of existing capabilities and competencies so that options are limited to those fitting previous successes (Ellson 2004) . If a new market's milieu does not match previous contexts, what was a competitive advantage can quickly be turned into a disadvantage .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the intervening years, normative settings on the cultural dimension of sustainability have emerged, paying diligently heed to socio-cultural indicators, to the effect that culture turned into strategically positioning determinant in terms of (Dessein et al, 2015, p. 29), a) supportive and self-promoting role (culture in sustainable development), b) framing, contextualising and mediating mode (culture for sustainable development), and c) foundational and structural framework as underlying dimension (culture as sustainable development) (Brocchi, 2016, pp. 49-50;Ellson, 2004;Gerner, 2013, 24 et seqq., 33, 154;Kagan & Kirchberg, 2016, p. 1489Pizzirani et al, 2014Pizzirani et al, , p. 1325Romeiro Filho, 2015, p. 4698;Steinkellner, 2016b, p. 4).…”
Section: ) Corporate Responsibility (Cr) Corporate Socialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially supply-chain and end-of-life processes have been identified promising to considerably intensify sustainability-oriented commitment. Both environmental and cultural aspects ought to be listed high on the corporate agenda in order to profit most from expected potentials; 3) There is need to institutionalize stakeholder dialoguing through providing professional stakeholder management that exceeds customerrelationship management; 4) There are cultural aspects to be painstakingly considered/prioritized, according to reports and strategic accounts of progressively shifting and/or extending marketing paradigms from business-tobusiness (b2b) to business-to-consumer (b2c) (Ellson, 2004;Keinert, 2008, 118; 124 et seqq. ); and 5) There is opportuneness by adopting sustainability conduct to review the value proposition, particularly in view of product portfolio (streamlining), market-specific management structures (regional autonomy) and strategic alignment (pioneering spirit/image).…”
Section: Sustainability Opportunitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such system visualizations as Sheth, Gardner, and Garrett's (1988) view that marketing should reflect the dynamic relationships between buyers and sellers influenced by external factors. Ellson (2004) provides a telling comment that reflects the importance of system dynamics thinking and interfunctional coordination for marketing:…”
Section: A System Dynamics Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%