2008
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture and social support.

Abstract: Social support is one of the most effective means by which people can cope with stressful events. Yet little research has examined whether there are cultural differences in how people utilize their social support networks. A review of studies on culture and social support presents evidence that Asians and Asian Americans are more reluctant to explicitly ask for support from close others than are European Americans because they are more concerned about the potentially negative relational consequences of such be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

41
850
11
19

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 894 publications
(921 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
41
850
11
19
Order By: Relevance
“…(The American group included a small group of U.S.-born Korean Americans as comparisons who are genetically similar to Koreans but who were raised in American culture.) Consistent with prior research (19)(20)(21), we predicted that Americans would report using emotional support more than Koreans to manage distress. We further predicted that, under conditions of high distress, Americans with the GG/AG genotype [note that, consistent with approaches in other studies to deal with skewed genotypic distribution (10, 24), we combine the heterozygous genotype with the rarest homozygous genotype], who are more sensitive to relational norms, would seek emotional support more than Americans with the AA genotype, because emotional support seeking is a normative coping response in the United States.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(The American group included a small group of U.S.-born Korean Americans as comparisons who are genetically similar to Koreans but who were raised in American culture.) Consistent with prior research (19)(20)(21), we predicted that Americans would report using emotional support more than Koreans to manage distress. We further predicted that, under conditions of high distress, Americans with the GG/AG genotype [note that, consistent with approaches in other studies to deal with skewed genotypic distribution (10, 24), we combine the heterozygous genotype with the rarest homozygous genotype], who are more sensitive to relational norms, would seek emotional support more than Americans with the AA genotype, because emotional support seeking is a normative coping response in the United States.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The norms regarding the seeking of emotional support differ markedly between Asian and American cultures, however. Across many different types of stressors, such as academic, health and social stressors, Asians are less likely to seek emotional support for dealing with their stressful events compared with European Americans (19)(20)(21). This cultural difference emerges with both open-ended assessments and standard coping inventories (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impact of AV that were not a focus of the present study could also be examined in future research. Some possibilities include the impact of indirect communication strategies (Park & Kim, 2008), emphasis on silence and introspection (Kim, 2002), implicit support-seeking (e.g., Kim, Sherman, & Taylor, 2008), and fatalism (Ho, 1990). The impact of other constructs such as acculturation, ethnic identity, discrimination, and marginalization could also be examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, we examined the interaction between the GSI and culture (i.e., American and Korean participants) in shaping the tendencies of self-expression, which have been shown to differ between cultures with European Americans exhibiting greater expressive tendencies than Asians (e.g., Butler et al 2009;Kim and Sherman 2007;Kim et al 2008;Lee et al 2009;Matsumoto et al 2008).…”
Section: The Present Workmentioning
confidence: 99%