1981
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.40.4.615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture and the perception of social dominance from facial expression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
75
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
75
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, our analysis based on the factor values revealed significant positive correlations for Dominance ratings between all three countries, supporting the hypothesis of cultural universalities in the perception of Dominance from nonverbal behavior. This result is in line with data reported by Keating et al (1981), which revealed universals in Dominance perception from facial expressions and with those of Kowner and Wiseman (2003) who could show that nonverbal status cues could be identified as such even if not part of the own cultural repertoire.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In fact, our analysis based on the factor values revealed significant positive correlations for Dominance ratings between all three countries, supporting the hypothesis of cultural universalities in the perception of Dominance from nonverbal behavior. This result is in line with data reported by Keating et al (1981), which revealed universals in Dominance perception from facial expressions and with those of Kowner and Wiseman (2003) who could show that nonverbal status cues could be identified as such even if not part of the own cultural repertoire.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Second, these works approached facial expressions mostly as broad contextual conditions rather than measurable dynamic cues. To our knowledge, few works have investigated the effect of fine-grained facial expressions, mostly based on facial action units, on the personality impressions from computer animated characters [4] or other human trait inferences trait inferences such as dominance [28] or leadership [48] from posed expressions in photos. In contrast, our work contributes to the literature by analyzing the independent cue utilization of seven standard facial expressions of emotion.…”
Section: Personality Impressions and Facial Expressions Of Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…appearance) and dynamic facial expressions [29]. Studies have shown that amongst dynamic cues, people rely on the expression of emotion [30], [39], [26], [28], [4], [48], because there is a generalized understanding that these expressions not only provide information about people's affective states, but also convey information about personal traits. For example, a person who expresses happiness may be seen as someone who is confident, assertive, and friendly, whereas someone who is angry could be seen as an aggressive person.…”
Section: Personality Impressions and Facial Expressions Of Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Displays of status help to organize social groups by providing hierarchies that assign roles to different members of the group (eg Schmid Mast 2001). Indeed, perceptions of dominance have previously been found to be highly consistent and predictive of important outcomes across perceivers (eg Keating et al 1981;Rule et al 2010), perhaps indicating that individuals are somewhat predisposed towards evaluating dominance and submission (Mazur 2005). Dominance can be readily judged from nonverbal behaviors (eg Schmid Mast and Hall 2004) and can have influences on the perception of important social traits, such as attractiveness and affect (Keating 1985;Ohman 1986;Raines et al 1990; see also Olson and Marshuetz 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%