2003
DOI: 10.1037/1099-9809.9.2.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture and validity of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised and Profile of Mood States in a New Zealand student sample.

Abstract: New Zealand students' performance was examined on assessments of psychopathology and mood as compared to normative data from the United States. New Zealand university students (N = 137) completed the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) and Profile of Mood States (POMS). Mean performances differed significantly from normative data for each SCL-90-R scale. No significant differences were found for the POMS scales. Within the sample, European (n = 82), Maori (n = 24), and Asian (n = 24) participants differed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, we fitted two log-binomial regression models separately for male and female “high scorer” and obtained adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% CI. Our choice of log-binomial versus the more common logistic regression was based on the fact that odds ratios obtained from logistic regression tend to overestimate the true effect size when the outcome under study is common (>20%) and because prevalence ratios are more readily interpretable compared to odds ratios in cross-sectional studies [46,47]. We used Stata version 12.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, United States) for all data analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, we fitted two log-binomial regression models separately for male and female “high scorer” and obtained adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% CI. Our choice of log-binomial versus the more common logistic regression was based on the fact that odds ratios obtained from logistic regression tend to overestimate the true effect size when the outcome under study is common (>20%) and because prevalence ratios are more readily interpretable compared to odds ratios in cross-sectional studies [46,47]. We used Stata version 12.1 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, United States) for all data analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual items were summed to produce a total score, and higher scores indicated greater anxiety. Validity for the POMS was established using several other anxiety measures such as the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised and the Bradburn Positive and Negative Affect Scales (Cronbach alpha = 0.9; three items) (Baker, Denniston, Zabora, Polland, & Dudle, 2002; Barker-Collo, 2003). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The POMS and its short-forms have been used with various populations of medical patients (Curran, Andrykowski & Studts 1995;Guadagnoli & Mor, 1989;Wyrwich & Yu, 2011;Baker, Denniston, Zabora, Polland, & Dudley 2002;Walker, Sprague, Sleator, & Ullmann 1988), children (Walker et al, 1988), adolescents (Terry, Lane, & Fogarty 2003), university students (Barker-Collo, 2003;Reddon, Marceau, & Holden 1985), working adults (Morfeld, Petersen, Kruger-Bodeker, von Mackensen, & Bullinger 2007), athletes (Bell & Howe, 1988) and older adults (Gibson, 1997;Shin & Colling, 2000;Nyenhuis, Yamamoto, Luchetta, Terrien, & Parmentier 1999). Construction of the POMS 2-A was based on a normative sample of 1000 North American adults, with stratified random sampling to approximate the USA 2000 census.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%