2005
DOI: 10.1128/aem.71.12.8784-8794.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture-Independent Characterization of the Microbiota of the Ant LionMyrmeleon mobilis(Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae)

Abstract: Ant lions are insect larvae that feed on the liquefied internal components of insect prey. Prey capture is assisted by the injection of toxins that are reportedly derived from both the insect and bacterial symbionts. These larvae display interesting gut physiology where the midgut is not connected to the hindgut, preventing elimination of solid waste until adulthood. The presence of a discontinuous gut and the potential involvement of bacteria in prey paralyzation suggest an interesting microbial role in ant l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They hypothesized that this pattern could be due to the humid environments that ticks prefer, which are more permissive conditions for desiccation-sensitive microbes such as proteobacteria. The prevalence of proteobacteria has also been shown for several other species of insects, including Culicoides sonorensis, an orbivirus vector (11); the honeybee Apis mellifera (34); and the ant lion, Myrmeleon mobilis (20). In contrast, bacterial communities associated with certain species of wood-and soil-feeding termites tend to be biased towards gram-positive microorganisms (29,65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They hypothesized that this pattern could be due to the humid environments that ticks prefer, which are more permissive conditions for desiccation-sensitive microbes such as proteobacteria. The prevalence of proteobacteria has also been shown for several other species of insects, including Culicoides sonorensis, an orbivirus vector (11); the honeybee Apis mellifera (34); and the ant lion, Myrmeleon mobilis (20). In contrast, bacterial communities associated with certain species of wood-and soil-feeding termites tend to be biased towards gram-positive microorganisms (29,65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same techniques are currently being applied to understanding the microbiota of a range of insects (11,29,34,47,53,55,56,65). For example, using such sequence-based approaches, Dunn and Stabb (20) found that the ant lion, Myrmeleon mobilis, harbors a relatively simple microbial community, represented mostly by Enterobacteriaceaeand Wolbachia-like microorganisms. In contrast, Campbell et al (11) found a more diverse microbiota in the biting midge, Culicoides sonorensis, comprised of genera from five different bacterial divisions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the clones in the 16S rRNA gene library were closely related to bacteria reported to be endosymbionts of various insects (17,20,21,46). Lacava et al (31) have reported similarity between the endophytes of host plants and bacteria inhabiting the head region of the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis, an important vector of various strains of X. fastidiosa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisms from the Enterobacteriaceae family that have the ability to ferment sugar (Ewing, 1986) seem to play a key role in the S. levis field population as they represent 70% of the total sequences found in the 16S rRNA gene library. Weevils and other insects harbor various maternally transmitted Enterobacteriaceae (Lefèvre et al, 2004); members of the Enterobacteriaceae are found in many environments, including the guts of other termite and insect species (Dillon and Dillon, 2004;Delalibera et al, 2005;Dunn and Stabb, 2005). The desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, also possesses an abundant gut microbiota consisting predominantly of Enterobacteriaceae (Hunt and Charnley, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%