2014
DOI: 10.1111/geob.12032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture‐led development and conflict over urban space: reimag(in)ing st petersburg, russia

Abstract: Culture‐led projects have long been part of strategies to regenerate cities in advanced capitalist economies. In recent decades those projects also have become a focal point of urban development in post‐socialist cities. This study argues that an attempt to reimage(in)e the city of St Petersburg through its culture‐led flagship project, Mariinsky Theatre–2, has generated significant changes not only to its built fabric, but also to its social fabric. In the context of a post‐socialist city, this study examines… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…St. Petersburg is known as a "Northern Venice" and "cultural capital," whose space is perceived as an embodiment of the illustrious history and culture and recognized as a world heritage site under UNESCO protection. 4 This urban landscape is represented as a value that was preserved and restored after the Second World War due to the valiant efforts of the inhabitants of the city (Trumbull, 2014) and should be preserved in the future. The so-called museumification of urban space supported by the strengthening of protective politics leads to the formation of a city whose public space is not intended for discussions or protests but cultural consumptionit should "be observed, but never touched or lived" (Zhelnina, 2013, p. 58).…”
Section: The Conservative "Museumificated" Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…St. Petersburg is known as a "Northern Venice" and "cultural capital," whose space is perceived as an embodiment of the illustrious history and culture and recognized as a world heritage site under UNESCO protection. 4 This urban landscape is represented as a value that was preserved and restored after the Second World War due to the valiant efforts of the inhabitants of the city (Trumbull, 2014) and should be preserved in the future. The so-called museumification of urban space supported by the strengthening of protective politics leads to the formation of a city whose public space is not intended for discussions or protests but cultural consumptionit should "be observed, but never touched or lived" (Zhelnina, 2013, p. 58).…”
Section: The Conservative "Museumificated" Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one of the city's flagship megaprojects has been the half‐billion‐euros construction of the second stage of the Mariinsky Theatre in 2004–13. As Trumbull (: 18) observes:
cultural policy among policymakers in the city is still based on an understanding of culture as an exclusive domain that refers to high culture, whose functions rarely reach beyond cultural production and by no means include broad cultural activities for the public and city neighbourhoods.
…”
Section: Cultural and Creative Spaces In St Petersburgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…St Petersburg's status as a city of high culture significantly dominates its cultural landscape (O'Connor, ). Trumbull (), reflecting on the nexus of cultural venues and urban development in St Petersburg, demonstrates the state‐led institutionalization of, and control over, the city's cultural landscape. For example, one of the city's flagship megaprojects has been the half‐billion‐euros construction of the second stage of the Mariinsky Theatre in 2004–13.…”
Section: Cultural and Creative Spaces In St Petersburgmentioning
confidence: 99%