2000
DOI: 10.1177/104063870001200609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture of Strategically Pooled Bovine Fecal Samples as a Method to Screen Herds for Paratuberculosis

Abstract: Abstract. Fecal samples from 733 cows in 11 dairy herds with a low prevalence of paratuberculosis were cultured for the presence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis both individually and after combining (pooling) in groups of 5. The culture procedure was the modified Jørgensen method, which uses NaOH and oxalic acid for decontamination and modified Löwenstein-Jensen agar slants for cultivation. Pooling was performed by mixing fecal samples from 5 animals ordered by age, herein referred to as strateg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pooling was performed by mixing fecal samples from 5 animals ordered by age. 11 Fecal culture procedure. Fecal samples were cultured using a modified Jørgensen method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooling was performed by mixing fecal samples from 5 animals ordered by age. 11 Fecal culture procedure. Fecal samples were cultured using a modified Jørgensen method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test schemes were based on herd examinations by serology (ELISA), individual faecal culture (IFC) [21] or pooled faecal culture (PFC) [22]. For each test scheme, the number of negative herd examinations required for a 'red' herd to move to the pool of 'green' herds was determined by the confidence that the concentration of Map in bulk milk was < 10 3 /L.…”
Section: Preventive Management Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such pooling across individuals has been suggested as a means of economically increasing the sensitivity of herd screening by allowing the inclusion of more animals. 7,16 Others have proposed that such variability in culture results is not the result of shedding variability on the part of the cow but rather is the result of the low sensitivity of conventional culture methods and that repeated culture of the same sample would achieve the same sensitivity increase. 8 Finally, in preclinical animals, Map is found in various body tissues including parenchymous organs, 9 feti, 12 and milk, 13 which suggests that intermittent, if not frequent, bacteremia episodes occur.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%