IntroductionA recurring theme in recent discussions (e.g., see Greenberg, 1999) is the tendency towards the standardisation of psychotherapy training and one can argue that the values and practices of universities have been in uential in this process 1 (see end). The aim of this paper, however, is to turn to the academic sphere, to explore the reverse side of the coin, and the increasing in uence of therapeutic culture upon the university, and discuss the process of teaching psychoanalytic studies to university undergraduates as an example of this. I do not use the term 'therapy culture' in this context to refer to the content and form of psychotherapy training per se, but rather to connote a broader cultural shift, in which the values, practices and emotional self re ective processes associated with the more private clinical sphere of therapeutic encounters, are now more widely used in the public sphere more generally, and in non-clinical settings such as universities. As Richards (1999a, p. 13) points out, "(therapy culture) … is marked by, amongst other things, a preoccupation with feeling and relationships and a belief that emotional life can be better managed through a process of learning about one's feelings and one's relationships".This cultural development points to a shift in the ways in which we identify with social institutions and relate to authority. I will use different aspects of psychoanalytic and cultural theory, and in particular, the work of Richards (1999a,b) to argue that as the ethos of the therapeutic has become more in uential in public life, the containing functions of different social institutions have also shifted to become less rigid and authoritarian. I draw on feminist psychoanalytic theory of Minsky (1998), Benjamin (1990) and others to develop this argument, and discuss the gendered implications of what Richards (1999a) refers to as the cultural "turn towards the therapeutic". I will argue that in the university, as generally, this has allowed a more feminised environment to emerge in which a more uid model of object relations can exist and grow between individuals and their external worlds. This of course mirrors the more tangible changes in the social and political relations between men and women. This has also created the possibility for new forms of psychic investment and projections that are less governed by the more rigid and defensive values of the old patriarchal moral order, and which allow for more complex and active relationships with authority to emerge, which create the space for movement, otherness and change. As I go on to discuss, in the context of the university and university learning, this more feminised uid way of relating implies a more permissively re exive environment and a less split off relationship to learning, and to real and imagined intellectual authorities that exist there.To illustrate this cultural shift, and the potentials for a more feminised environment