2019
DOI: 10.1086/699253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culture versus the State? The “Defend-My-Mother-Tongue” Protests in Guangzhou

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amid this growing nationalism, Mandarin, the national language, became an important instrument for ‘upholding national unity and ethnic solidarity’, as was written in the 2000 Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Standard Spoken and Written Chinese Language ( National People’s Congress of China , 2000). Before the nationwide promotion of Mandarin was cemented in state law, the Guangdong government had already, in 1992, issued a ‘Decision to Vigorously Promote Mandarin’, specifying that ‘by the end of 1995, Mandarin should become the only language used in primary and middle schools and that kindergarten teachers should just use Mandarin so as to develop students’ habit of speaking Mandarin earlier in childhood’ (Ho and Lu, 2019: 82). The results were disastrous for local language: a 2004 survey found that Mandarin had become the prime language of younger generations (aged 39 years or below) living in Guangzhou (capital city of Guangdong) for most formal and informal occasions, except in family settings (Ho and Lu, 2019).…”
Section: Critical Han Studies and Internal Colonialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amid this growing nationalism, Mandarin, the national language, became an important instrument for ‘upholding national unity and ethnic solidarity’, as was written in the 2000 Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Standard Spoken and Written Chinese Language ( National People’s Congress of China , 2000). Before the nationwide promotion of Mandarin was cemented in state law, the Guangdong government had already, in 1992, issued a ‘Decision to Vigorously Promote Mandarin’, specifying that ‘by the end of 1995, Mandarin should become the only language used in primary and middle schools and that kindergarten teachers should just use Mandarin so as to develop students’ habit of speaking Mandarin earlier in childhood’ (Ho and Lu, 2019: 82). The results were disastrous for local language: a 2004 survey found that Mandarin had become the prime language of younger generations (aged 39 years or below) living in Guangzhou (capital city of Guangdong) for most formal and informal occasions, except in family settings (Ho and Lu, 2019).…”
Section: Critical Han Studies and Internal Colonialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This initiative has, however, fueled discontent and conflicts between local residents and the government (Chen et al, 2020;Gransow, 2014). Second, urbanization in Guangzhou has diminished the geopolitical significance and dominant position of the local Canton culture and traditions, prompting the local urbanites to develop antagonistic tendencies against migrants (Ho and Lu, 2018). Guangzhou has been the cultural hub for Canton culture and the ancestral home of the Cantonese people (or Yue culture) for over 2,200 years.…”
Section: Context and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, urbanite identity in Guangzhou is inseparable from the Canton culture. However, massive rural-to-urban migration as a result of state-led urbanization has not only reshaped the demographic composition of the city but has also changed its language and sociocultural environment as well as its socio-spatial environment as many historical buildings and old neighborhoods were demolished to provide space for new infrastructure developments (Gransow, 2014; Ho and Lu, 2018). Such dramatic spatial reconfiguration and the dislocation experience has made many local Guangzhou residents powerless and angry due the loss of sense of belonging in their home city.…”
Section: Context and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This movement brought a government retreat on use of Putonghua in media, but a study based on interviews determined that the movement was mainly about local resident concerns around "the current pattern in the distribution of resources in Guangzhou," that is, the unsubstantiated "sentiment that they are disadvantaged in obtaining school places, jobs, or hospital beds" compared to migrants. Many movement participants were not Cantonese speakers, and language was a focus mainly in order to render the protest about resources "safe" in relation to the authorities (Ho and Lu, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%