2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-4179(99)00143-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultured epithelial autografts in extensive burn coverage of severely traumatized patients: a five year single-center experience with 30 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid the loss of heat and fluid from the wound, the generation of coverage becomes necessary. Autologous cultured epidermal substitutes can be another alternative [3], but when dermal bed has been completely destroyed, this approach drives to unsatisfactory results owing to the fragility of the graft and wound contraction and scar formation [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the loss of heat and fluid from the wound, the generation of coverage becomes necessary. Autologous cultured epidermal substitutes can be another alternative [3], but when dermal bed has been completely destroyed, this approach drives to unsatisfactory results owing to the fragility of the graft and wound contraction and scar formation [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Numerous researchers applied the method of cultured keratinocytes clinically for the treatment of severely burned patients. 16,17 However, application of 3T3 cells for keratinocyte expansion is associated with the risk of contamination with infections and animal antigens. 18 At present, the focus of research is to discover an optimal protocol for keratinocyte culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, los pacientes que reciben las células autólogas cultivadas tiene tasas de mortalidad mucho menores que aquellos que reciben tratamientos convencionales. Al mismo tiempo, se reporta que en estos pacientes se ha reducido la necesidad de intervenciones quirúrgicas y el dolor causado por las lesiones (CotoSegura et al, 2007;Carsin et al, 2000y Wood, Kolybaba y Allen, 2006. Por otro lado, cuando las lesiones no son muy extensas ni profundas, este tipo de tratamiento sí puede representar una disminución de costos, asociados principalmente a la reducción del tiempo requerido para sanar, lo que implica menos gastos en personal médico, menos insumos y menor tiempo de internamiento.…”
Section: Consideraciones Finalesunclassified