Cultures and Disasters

Krüger, Fred; Bankoff, Greg; Cannon, Terry; Orlowski, Benedikt M.; Schipper, E. Lisa F.

doi:10.4324/9781315797809

Cited by 97 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sementara, bencana tersendiri membahayakan masyarakat yang tidak mengerti nilai kearifan lokal terdahulu yang seharusnya dilestarikan. Upaya ini muncul dalam bentuk nilai sosial, tradisi, dan keterikatan yang baik terhadap lingkungan (Krüger et al 2015;Salura dan Lake 2014). Pengalaman menghadapi bencana alam diakumulasi menjadi pengetahuan mitigasi seperti membentuk tradisi hingga kemampuan memprediksi datangnya bencana alam secara lokal pada konteks tertentu (Permana, Nasution, dan Gunawijaya 2011).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Mempelajari budaya mitigasi masyarakat adat dilakukan dengan membaca struktur sosiokultural (Sabri 2004 Sumber: (Voss 2008;Krüger et al 2015) Resiliensi kebencanaan dibedakan atas tiga kapasitas. Kapasitas adaptif (adaptive capacity) merupakan tindakan mempertahankan budaya mitigasi bencana dari intervensi luar lingkup komunitas.…”

Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified

“…Indikator resiliensi bencana (Voss 2008;Krüger et al 2015) yang muncul pada proses akumulasi pengetahuan dan pembentukan keterampilan sepadan dengan kapasitas partisipatif karena dari proses-proses ini muncul banyak manfaat/modal kultural dan sosialekonominya (nonkultural). Modal kultural (cultural capital) menjadi pemicu bagi modal ekonomi-sosial dan berlaku sebaliknya (Bourdieu 1986;Dovey 2009).…”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Mandate (credential) as mitigation culture on local community of Sindang Barang

Hutomo¹,

Ekomadyo²,

Ameir³

2020

ARTEKS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kearifan lokal dapat dipelajari melalui penelusuran terhadap kampung adat secara fisik pada tata ruang kawasan, bentuk arsitektur, dan aktivitas sehari-hari. Organisasi yang berlaku dalam sebuah lingkungan menjadi faktor penting dalam mengelola budaya mitigasi yang kontekstual. Adanya wewenang (mandat) dapat menguasai nilai/modal kultural dan menciptakan unsur simbolis seperti kepercayaan atau keyakinan. Kampung Budaya Sindang Barang diambil sebagai kasus kajian untuk mengungkap sejarah dan peran mandat dalam budaya mitigasi bencana. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengamati adanya peran mandat beserta dampaknya dalam mitigasi bencana. Peran mandat juga ditelaah untuk melihat adanya upaya pelestarian nilai-nilai kearifan lokal terhadap perkembangan jaman. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif-kualitatif dengan menelusuri fenomena dan artefak yang ada di lapangan. Analisis dilakukan melalui dua tahap. Tahap pertama adalah membuat tabel upaya mitigasi berdasarkan program atau artefak yang masih ada. Tahap ke-dua adalah membuat diskusi konsep budaya mitigasi berdasarkan kapasitasnya. Adapun mitigasi yang terlihat dari program dan artefak Kampung Budaya Sindang Barang adalah risiko kebakaran, bencana gempa bumi, dan tanah longsor. Proses menentukan mandat sepadan dengan kapasitas adaptif karena tahap ini cenderung mengarah kepada pantangan atau perintah dalam sebuah program yang diselenggarakan secara sistematis pada konteks tertentu.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mandate (credential) as mitigation culture on local community of Sindang Barang

Hutomo¹,

Ekomadyo²,

Ameir³

2020

ARTEKS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interestingly, the Turkish workshop participants openly stated that they attributed a certain risk behaviour to a specific prevention culture in Turkey. While essentialist views on culture, especially when certain behavioural schemes are attributed to certain groups or even parts of the population, can easily promote stereotypes or a process of "othering" (Brons, 2015), this exchange reveals the importance of understanding the impact of cultural interpretations as a prerequisite for effective risk communication, a fact which has also been recognized by a broad array of research done in this field (for example Krüger et al, 2015;Hoffman and Oliver-Smith, 2002;Renn and Rohrmann, 2000;Stoppa und Berti, 2013). Given that culture is not static, but emerges through contingent configurations of multiple practices, values, and beliefs that individuals use to engage and make sense of the world (Nasir and Hand, 2006), it seems promising also to approach risk communication as being embedded in contingent cultural contexts, and not to reduce it to mere scientific knowledge exchanges.…”

Section: Impact Of Seismic Risk Communication On Individual Preparednessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They describe a multitude of different factors that influence the relationship between risk perception and preparedness for actions, with personal experience of a natural hazard and trust -or lack of trust -in authorities and experts hav-ing a particularly significant impact (Wachinger et al, 2013). The need for hazard practitioners to pay more attention to the different factors shaping risk behaviour, and to analyse how, and if, adaptation and mitigation measures integrate local concerns is also outlined by other scholars (Moser, 2014;Krüger et al, 2015;Egner et al, 2014;Bankoff, 2015;Irwin et al, 1996;Samaddar et al, 2014;Taylan, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Earthquake risk communication as dialogue – insights from a workshop in Istanbul's urban renewal neighbourhoods

Ickert

Stewart

2016

Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. An important paradox of hazard communication is that the more effectively a potential physical threat is made public by the scientist, the more readily the scientific message becomes normalized into the daily discourses of ordinary life. As a result, a heightened risk awareness does not necessarily motivate personal or collective preparedness. If geoscientists are to help at-risk communities adopt meaningful measures to protect themselves, new strategies are needed for public communication and community engagement. This paper outlines an attempt to develop a novel approach to train geoscientists, using doctoral and post-doctoral researchers in an EU integrated training network studying tectonic processes and geohazards in Turkey. An urban field visit to seismically vulnerable neighbourhoods in Istanbul allowed the researchers to meet with local residents facing the seismic threat. Those meetings exposed the complex social, political and cultural concerns among Istanbul's at-risk urban communities. These concerns were used to provoke subsequent focus group discussions among the group of geoscientists about roles, responsibilities and methods of communicating hazard information to the public. Through the direct testimony of local residents and geoscientists, we explore the form that new strategies for public communication and community engagement might take.

show abstract

Difficult decisions: Migration from Small Island Developing States under climate change

Kelman

2015

Earth's Future

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The impacts of climate change on Small Island Developing States (SIDS) are leading to discussions regarding decision-making about the potential need to migrate. Despite the situation being well-documented, with many SIDS aiming to raise the topic to prominence and to take action for themselves, limited support and interest has been forthcoming from external sources. This paper presents, analyzes, and critiques a decision-making flowchart to support actions for SIDS dealing with climate change-linked migration. The flowchart contributes to identifying the pertinent topics to consider and the potential support needed to implement decision-making.The flowchart has significant limitations and there are topics which it cannot resolve. On-the-ground considerations include who decides, finances, implements, monitors, and enforces each decision. Additionally, views within communities differ, hence mechanisms are needed for dealing with differences, while issues to address include moral and legal blame for any climate change-linked migration, the ultimate goal of the decision-making process, the wider role of migration in SIDS communities and the right to judge decision-making and decisions. The conclusions summarize the paper, emphasizing the importance of considering contexts beyond climate change and multiple SIDS voices.

show abstract

Cultures and Disasters

Cited by 97 publications

References 0 publications

Mandate (credential) as mitigation culture on local community of Sindang Barang

Mandate (credential) as mitigation culture on local community of Sindang Barang

Earthquake risk communication as dialogue – insights from a workshop in Istanbul's urban renewal neighbourhoods

Difficult decisions: Migration from Small Island Developing States under climate change

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About