1988
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4608(88)90312-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Culturing and robotic harvesting of bone marrow, lymph nodes, peripheral blood, fibroblasts, and solid tumors with in situ techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cultures were harvested using a Tecan robotic harvest system MiniPrep75™ using the standard method for in situ cultures. 27 The coverslips were dried in a Thermotron Slide Drying Chamber CDS-5™. 28 After slide drying, the slides were submerged in a trypsin working solution followed by a water rinse.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cultures were harvested using a Tecan robotic harvest system MiniPrep75™ using the standard method for in situ cultures. 27 The coverslips were dried in a Thermotron Slide Drying Chamber CDS-5™. 28 After slide drying, the slides were submerged in a trypsin working solution followed by a water rinse.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cytogenetic analysis, bone marrow specimens were processed by both direct and short-term culture techniques as described previously. 14,15 Circulating plasma cells were estimated based on a similar method as described elsewhere. 16 Circulating plasma cells were defined as a poor prognostic factor when у3% of cytoplasmic immunoglobulinpositive cells were considered plasma cells by morphologic examination.…”
Section: Prognostic Factors and Risk Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cytogenetic analysis, bone marrow specimens were processed by both direct and short-term culture techniques, as described previously. 13,14 The 2 and Fisher exact tests were used to compare differences among the three subgroups for nominal variables; the rank-sum test was used for continuous variables. Survival analysis was done using the method described by Kaplan and Meier.…”
Section: Approval Of the Mayo Foundation Institutional Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%