2021
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cumulative burden of clinically significant aortic stenosis in community-dwelling older adults

Abstract: ObjectivesCurrent estimates of aortic stenosis (AS) frequency have mostly relied on cross-sectional echocardiographic or longitudinal administrative data, making understanding of AS burden incomplete. We performed case adjudications to evaluate the frequency of AS and assess differences by age, sex and race in an older cohort with long-term follow-up.MethodsWe developed case-capture methods using study echocardiograms, procedure and diagnosis codes, heart failure events and deaths for targeted review of medica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 316 patients in the UK Biobank cohort received aortic or mitral valve interventions. Even if we assume that only 10% of reported AS in this sample was severe, this would imply less than half received an aortic valve intervention, which is similar to a recent finding using the US-based Cardiovascular Health Study 25. A French population-based cohort found similar low uptake of valvular interventions despite high associated societal burden in mortality, readmissions and healthcare costs 26.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only 316 patients in the UK Biobank cohort received aortic or mitral valve interventions. Even if we assume that only 10% of reported AS in this sample was severe, this would imply less than half received an aortic valve intervention, which is similar to a recent finding using the US-based Cardiovascular Health Study 25. A French population-based cohort found similar low uptake of valvular interventions despite high associated societal burden in mortality, readmissions and healthcare costs 26.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Even if we assume that only 10% of reported AS in this sample was severe, this would imply less than half received an aortic valve intervention, which is similar to a recent finding using the US-based Cardiovascular Health Study. 25 A French population-based cohort found similar low uptake of valvular interventions despite high associated societal burden in mortality, readmissions and healthcare costs. 26 Others have highlighted the under-referral of patients with severe MR for surgical repair 27 or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, 28 and of patients with severe AS for TAVR or SAVR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aortic stenosis (AS) is common in the elderly with an increasing number of patients as our population ages but precise estimates of prevalence have been limited by inadequate diagnostic data in most clinical databases. In this issue of Heart, Owens and colleagues 1 performed a targeted review of medical records for 5795 participants over age 65 years in the population based Cardiovascular Health Study to determine the frequency of moderate to severe AS. Over 25 years, the cumulative frequency of significant AS was 3.7% with 85% of these patients being hospitalised for severe AS, although only ½ underwent aortic valve replacement.…”
Section: Catherine M Ottomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aortic stenosis (AS) disease is one of the most common valvular diseases associated with age [ 1 , 2 ]. Over the past 30 years, the global prevalence of calcific aortic valve disease-associated deaths has increased [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%