Cumulative Causation, Market Transition, and Emigration from China

Abstract

In this paper, we report findings from a recent survey of international migration from China's Fujian province to the United States. We take advantage of the ethnosurvey approach as used in the Mexican Migration Project. Surveys were done in migrant-sending communities in China as well as in destination communities of New York City. We derive hypotheses from two strands of recent studiesthe international migration literature and the market transition debate. Our results are in general consistent with hypotheses derived from cumulative causation of migration. However, because of the geographical location of China as compared to Mexico, there are some differences between the two countries in terms of particular migration patterns to the United States. As expected, at the community level, migration prevalence ratio (measuring migration networks) increases the propensity of migration for other members in the community. In contrast, having a household member migrated previously does not increase the propensity of migration of other household members until debt for previous migration is paid off. Our research clearly demonstrates the value of bringing the case of China into the comparative study of international migration. With respect to market transition theory, we find that political power continues to be an important factor in the order of social stratification in the coastal Fujian province.

Does Ideological Education in China Suppress Trust in Religion and Foster Trust in Government?

“…However, the phenomenon cannot be simplistically taken as an evidence for the positive association between education and confidence in the government. Some studies have revealed that CCP membership consistently predicts better life chances, such as scholarship opportunities, better jobs, and promotions in work (Liang et al 2008). That is, many young people join the party for such tangible gains in life.…”

Testing the Latino paradox in Latin America: A population-based study of Intra-regional immigrants in Chile

“…Because of the large number of potential explanatory variables, testing of multiplicative interaction terms between significant co-variates for each regression model was primarily guided by theories of healthy migrant effect (i.e. push and pull theory [37][38][39] , cumulative causation theory [40][41][42][43] , globalization and migration [44][45][46] ). Rather than testing all possible interactions, these were restricted to terms of scientific interest and literature to support their exploration.…”

The causal mechanism of migration behaviors of African immigrants in Guangzhou: from the perspective of cumulative causation theory

“…First, the model is more applicable to discussing the condition of emigration when the original society is an agricultural community and lacking urban economic characteristics (Liang et al 2008). This is because rural areas are more likely to be a homogeneous society that easily sustains social networks, whereas cities are more like a heterogeneous society in which maintaining social networks is more difficult (Liang et al 2008).…”

“…First, the model is more applicable to discussing the condition of emigration when the original society is an agricultural community and lacking urban economic characteristics (Liang et al 2008). This is because rural areas are more likely to be a homogeneous society that easily sustains social networks, whereas cities are more like a heterogeneous society in which maintaining social networks is more difficult (Liang et al 2008). Second, the cumulative causation model measures the social networks of migrants as their network relations connecting communities of departure and communities of arrival, which requires researchers to measure the number of connections that a migrant has at his or her destination before he or she arrives.…”