Cumulative Disadvantage in the American Criminal Justice System

Abstract

Research on inequality in punishment has a long and storied history, yet the overwhelming focus has been on episodic disparity in isolated stages of criminal case processing (e.g., arrest, prosecution, or sentencing). Although theories of cumulative disadvantage exist in criminology, they are seldom adapted to account for treatment in the criminal justice system. We provide an overview of the concept of cumulative disadvantage in the life course and review evidence on the development of cumulative disadvantages across stages of the criminal justice system. In doing so, we appraise the empirical research on policing, prosecution, and the courts and consider how these largely separate bodies of scholarship are inherently connected. We conclude with a call for future research that focuses more explicitly on the ways that life-course disadvantages shape contact with the criminal justice system and how these processes work to perpetuate patterns of disadvantage within the system and in subsequent life outcomes.

Mental disorders and intimate partner violence perpetrated by men towards women: A Swedish population-based longitudinal study

“…Therefore, even though we only captured a subset of IPV perpetrations, the relative risk estimates in the patient analyses (patients versus general population controls) and sibling analyses (siblings versus general population controls) should not be significantly affected. Second, there could be a selection bias against individuals who are in a vulnerable position, such as those with low socioeconomic status being more likely to be arrested for IPV [63]. This may have inflated the prevalence of IPV among certain diagnostic groups.…”

The Flow of Murder Cases Through the Criminal Justice System in a Brazilian City

“…The purpose of this study was to use a theory produced in a Western context (the behavior of law) to understand the factors shaping the decision-making in Brazil. While definitive tests of Donald Black's (1976) theory remains opened to further analyses (as pointed by Fagan & Geller, 2018;King & Light, 2019;Kurlychek & Johnson, 2019;Ylang & Holtfreter, 2019), our results contribute to this debate creating an essential research agenda on how the Brazilian Criminal Justice System handles murder cases.…”

Sentencing scorecards: Reducing racial disparities in prison sentences at their source

“…It is our view that a scorecard that tries to combine the racial disparity from each of those processes will be ultimately less actionable and less useful. While we recognize and appreciate the movement in the criminology literature to study disparity at every stage (Kurlychek & Johnson, 2019; Kutateladze & Andiloro, 2014), we chose to create a scorecard in New York that focused on the sentencing stage as understood by members of the courtroom workgroup. We left open with the Commission the possibility that future scorecards could study other stages 6 .…”

“…The harder it is to dismiss the scorecard, the more sensitive government actors will be to the scorecard. Propensity score approaches have been applied to assess juvenile sentencing in adult court (Kurlychek & Johnson, 2019), racial disparities in capital sentencing (Paternoster & Brame, 2008) as well as the effect of deportable status (Orricket al., 2016), and race (Franklin, 2015) on sentencing outcomes. Paternoster and Brame's (2008) capital sentencing analysis uncovered racial disparities in Maryland capital sentencing as well as variation across Maryland counties in the application of the death penalty in otherwise factually similar cases.…”