2018
DOI: 10.3280/mm2018-002004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cura e controllo al confine: scritturazioni e pratiche del sapere medico negli hotspot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What emerges from these multifaceted and multiscalar assemblage is a shifting set of intermittent, fitful circulations. Similarly to what characterized border management and in particular the hotspot approach between 2015 and 2020 (Anderlini, 2018), the management of migration during the pandemic embodies also the humanitarian discourse and imperative of “saving lives” in its organization of human mobilities, instituting new distinctions and classifications between the “healthy” and the “contagious” to further partition populations, mixing already established divisions of race, class and gender with public health concerns. This form of governance (Fassin, 2007) articulates additional mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion, distinguishing between who must be protected, conflating them with national security discourse: the “safety of the population” (Foucault, 2009) coincides with stricter controls of state borders and the possible complete isolation of the national territory from outsiders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What emerges from these multifaceted and multiscalar assemblage is a shifting set of intermittent, fitful circulations. Similarly to what characterized border management and in particular the hotspot approach between 2015 and 2020 (Anderlini, 2018), the management of migration during the pandemic embodies also the humanitarian discourse and imperative of “saving lives” in its organization of human mobilities, instituting new distinctions and classifications between the “healthy” and the “contagious” to further partition populations, mixing already established divisions of race, class and gender with public health concerns. This form of governance (Fassin, 2007) articulates additional mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion, distinguishing between who must be protected, conflating them with national security discourse: the “safety of the population” (Foucault, 2009) coincides with stricter controls of state borders and the possible complete isolation of the national territory from outsiders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The security of the circulations is primarily undertaken through the operation of the border, with its selection of migrant mobilities. This operation works creating spaces of exception, where the sovereign grasp is suspended and other imperatives and rationalities are followed – such as the conflation of humanitarian and securitarian reasons in the case of the hotspots (Anderlini, 2018) or, more recently, the quarantine ships. Simultaneously it works through the implementation of biopolitical apparatuses, as emerges from the digitization of border controls, the diffuse surveillance and the datafication of bodies (Amoore & Hall, 2009; Glouftsios & Scheel, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Framementioning
confidence: 99%