“…but looking back at its development 30 years later, at a time when we think a lot about how medical research is best facilitated and supported, it might be interesting to go back over the very beginnings, for any lessons to be learnt, and to see, as far as one can, where events might have taken a different and less useful course. Perhaps I should stress that a different course was very possible: four of the methonium series, as we now call it, up to pentamethonium (which is hardly distinguishable from hexamethonium), were listed, in a major review (Craig, 1948) as having 'only weak pharmacological actions'; and I doubt if any planner, or computer survey, would have picked them out for study. There is some interest, too, in the fact that it was a non-industrial development.…”