Curating Scientific Information in Knowledge Infrastructures

Abstract

Interpreting observational data is a fundamental task in the sciences, specifically in earth and environmental science where observational data are increasingly acquired, curated, and published systematically by environmental research infrastructures. Typically subject to substantial processing, observational data are used by research communities, their research groups and individual scientists, who interpret such primary data for their meaning in the context of research investigations. The result of interpretation is information-meaningful secondary or derived data-about the observed environment. Research infrastructures and research communities are thus essential to evolving uninterpreted observational data to information. In digital form, the classical bearer of information are the commonly known "(elaborated) data products," for instance maps. In such form, meaning is generally implicit e.g., in map colour coding, and thus largely inaccessible to machines. The systematic acquisition, curation, possible publishing and further processing of information gained in observational data interpretation-as machine readable data and their machine readable meaning-is not common practice among environmental research infrastructures. For a use case in aerosol science, we elucidate these problems and present a Jupyter based prototype infrastructure that exploits a machine learning approach to interpretation and could support a research community in interpreting observational data and, more importantly, in curating and further using resulting information about a studied natural phenomenon.

Connected Research: The Potential of the PID Graph

“…The general term Scientific Knowledge Graph has been coined for such large-scale graphs, going beyond citations of published papers to encompass datasets, researchers, funding grants, and so on—precisely the kinds of entities that have PIDs. Examples are the Research Graph, 17 the Open Research Knowledge Graph, 18 and the OpenAIRE Research Graph, 19 all of which describe the graph of connected scholarly resources and knowledge using a number of different approaches.…”

FAIR Data and Services in Biodiversity Science and Geoscience

“…Metadata must be detailed enough for data to be understood by those who do not own and did not create the data. Meaning acquired from interpreting specimens must be made explicit by using appropriate standard representation schemes, and otherwise semantic differences create substantial barriers to interoperability [4]. Additionally, users should not need to know different methods for working with logically similar but locationally separate parts of the collection.…”

Incorporating RDA Outputs in the Design of a European Research Infrastructure for Natural Science Collections

“…The data derived from and linked to physical specimens must be easily findable and accessible. They must adhere to open standards with rich machine-comprehensible semantics, as well as conveying context (Stocker 2018) so they are interoperable and widely reusable by both humans and machines. Just being machine-readable (i.e., by linking to ontologies and encoding as RDF or JSON-LD) is insufficient to achieve reusability and, especially for reproducibility of science, provenance, data quality, credit and attribution (Bechhofer et al 2013).…”