1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)80272-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CURE multicenter randomized, prospective trial of gold probe vs. Injection & gold probe for hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the combination of injection therapy with another method of hemostasis (e.g., hemoclips or heat probe) outperforms injection alone for controlling bleeding, particularly high-risk bleeding [ 7 , 8 ]. However, therapeutic gain of contact thermal therapy and injection therapies may display no more hemostatic benefits than contact thermal monotherapy does [ 9 ]. Because contact thermal therapy, such as heat probe, exerts a tamponade effect on the artery, coaptivity coagulates the tissue, activates arterial coagulation, and causes edema that compresses the artery, and it has similar hemostatic efficacy to combined therapy [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the combination of injection therapy with another method of hemostasis (e.g., hemoclips or heat probe) outperforms injection alone for controlling bleeding, particularly high-risk bleeding [ 7 , 8 ]. However, therapeutic gain of contact thermal therapy and injection therapies may display no more hemostatic benefits than contact thermal monotherapy does [ 9 ]. Because contact thermal therapy, such as heat probe, exerts a tamponade effect on the artery, coaptivity coagulates the tissue, activates arterial coagulation, and causes edema that compresses the artery, and it has similar hemostatic efficacy to combined therapy [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, the rate of peptic ulcer rebleeding was relatively low (3.4%) in the combined group, even though those patients did not receive high-dose PPI therapy. A lower incidence of Forrest grades IIa and IIb than other clinical trials may contribute to this phenomenon [ 7 9 , 11 ]. No significant difference existed between the two treatment groups in terms of need for surgery, need for blood transfusion, hospital stay, and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intervention on lesions with active bleeding, a visible vessel or adherent clot should be undertaken. Treatment of active bleeding has been shown to be well treated with combination therapy of adrenaline injection (diluted with saline 1:10000) and thermal coagulation (8,9). However, in the treatment of lesions with a visible vessel, combination treatment has not been shown to be more effective than using thermal coagulation alone (8,9).…”
Section: Review Of Gib Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of active bleeding has been shown to be well treated with combination therapy of adrenaline injection (diluted with saline 1:10000) and thermal coagulation (8,9). However, in the treatment of lesions with a visible vessel, combination treatment has not been shown to be more effective than using thermal coagulation alone (8,9). There is ongoing debate regarding the ideal management of lesions with an adherent clot (10)(11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Review Of Gib Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%