1981
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<203::aid-cncr2820470133>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cure rate estimation and long-term prognosis of uterine cervix carcinoma

Abstract: This paper reports the prognosis results of a retrospective study of over 2000 cases of uterine cervix carcinoma totally treated at Institut Gustave-Roussy from 1950 to 1963. From the study of their long-term survival, an overall cure rate was estimated at 49% seven years after the start of primary treatment. A study of several covariables revealed stage and histologic type to be the only significant factors correlated with prognosis. Relative death rates were then estimated at each level of the two interactin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
1

Year Published

1984
1984
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the importance of stage fell noticeably when allowance was made for the presence of lymph-node involvement. In agreement with Lee et al (1981) our study does not support earlier findings of a worse prognosis associated with a poorly differentiated histological grade (Stanhope et al 1980;Chung et al 1981), with adenocarcinoma rather than squamous carcinoma (Pejovic et al 1981) (though the numbers are too limited to draw any firm conclusions on this item) or with pregnancy (Stone et al 1965).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Conversely, the importance of stage fell noticeably when allowance was made for the presence of lymph-node involvement. In agreement with Lee et al (1981) our study does not support earlier findings of a worse prognosis associated with a poorly differentiated histological grade (Stanhope et al 1980;Chung et al 1981), with adenocarcinoma rather than squamous carcinoma (Pejovic et al 1981) (though the numbers are too limited to draw any firm conclusions on this item) or with pregnancy (Stone et al 1965).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The prognosis of adenocarcinoma was not poorer than that of squamous cell carcinoma. This finding contrasts with studies reporting that adenocarcinoma of the cervix has a worse prognosis than squamous cell carcinoma( 8, 29), which has been ascribed to the fact that lymph node metastasis may develop earlier in adenocarcinoma than in squamous cell carcinoma. In our study, we could not demonstrate that lymph node metastasis was more common in adenocarcinoma ( 4, 8).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, two DNA bands of 6.2 and 5.0 kb were observCervical cancers are treated by surgery, radiation and cytotoxic drugs (Friedlander et al, 1983;Haie et al, 1988;McGuire et al, 1989). Treatment depends on prognosis which is determined by clinicopathological parameters of which the most important are clinical stage at diagnosis and nodal status (Pejovic et al, 1981). However in most cases, cervical cancers respond poorly to chemotherapy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%