purpose. To compare computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) with incisional biopsy in diagnosing musculoskeletal lesions. Methods. 62 men and 50 women aged 12 to 83 (mean, 45) years who underwent a CT-guided CNB were compared with 31 men and 33 women aged 9 to 81 (mean, 53) years who underwent an incisional biopsy. All specimens had final pathology report to compare with. Comparisons were made in terms of (1) diagnostic rate, (2) accuracy in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions, (3) accuracy in distinguishing low-from high-grade sarcomas, (4) accuracy for histological diagnosis, and (5) p=1.00), the accuracy for specific diagnosis (75.9% vs. 85.2%, p=0.17), the repeated biopsy rate (6.3% vs. 4.7%, p=0.75), and the complication rate (0.9% vs. 4.7%, p=0.14). The accuracy for specific diagnosis was higher for bone than soft-tissue lesions for both CTguided CNB (87.0% vs. 59.5%, p=0.002) and incisional biopsy (87.0% vs. 77.3%, p=0.43). The accuracy of CT-guided CNB for specific diagnosis of benign softtissue tumours as well as infection and inflammation was relatively low. conclusion. CT-guided CNB is safe, easy to perform, efficient, and less invasive, and should be considered as a first-line biopsy for musculoskeletal lesions.