2019
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggz166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curie depth estimation from magnetic anomaly data: a re-assessment using multitaper spectral analysis and Bayesian inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, any method for Curie depth estimation has high intrinsic uncertainty related to the choice of fractal parameter and size of the window used to discretize maps of the magnetic anomaly (Audet & Gosselin, 2019;Mather & Fullea, 2019), and heat flow data are occasionally perturbed by hydrothermal circulation and suffer from low spatial coverage (Mather et al, 2018). For these reasons, Li et al (2013) and Li & Wang (2016) state that thermal structures can be better constrained through Curie-point depth maps derived from magnetic anomaly data, independent of heat flow measurements.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, any method for Curie depth estimation has high intrinsic uncertainty related to the choice of fractal parameter and size of the window used to discretize maps of the magnetic anomaly (Audet & Gosselin, 2019;Mather & Fullea, 2019), and heat flow data are occasionally perturbed by hydrothermal circulation and suffer from low spatial coverage (Mather et al, 2018). For these reasons, Li et al (2013) and Li & Wang (2016) state that thermal structures can be better constrained through Curie-point depth maps derived from magnetic anomaly data, independent of heat flow measurements.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the usual procedure implies to divide the studied area into numerous windows that overlap between them (e.g. : Okubo et al, 1985;Blakely, 1988;Lesane et al, 2015;Bouligand et al, 2009;Idarraga-García & Vargaz, 2018;Audet & Gosselin, 2019). This overlapping allows to increase the data coverage (resolution) and to avoid data loss (of anomalies or frequencies contained in image borders).…”
Section: Windows: Geometry Sizes and Overlappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is a large difference between the opposite edges of an image, it will generate an abrupt discontinuity in the signal. These discontinuities are of large bandwidth and can mask other relevant components in the spectrum (Brigham, 1988;Moisan, 2011;Mahmood et al, 2015;Burger & Burge, 2016;Audet & Gosselin, 2019).…”
Section: Windowing Filters and Reduction To The Polementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a prescribed geological model, populated with correlated and uncorrelated prior information on rates of heat production and thermal conductivity, we found the MAP estimate of temperature subject to the data we assimilated (Figs 5 and 13). However, Curie depth has high intrinsic uncertainty related to the choice of fractal parameter and size of the window used to discretize maps of the magnetic anomaly (Audet & Gosselin 2019;Mather & Fullea 2019), and heat flow data are occasionally perturbed by hydrothermal circulation and suffer from low spatial coverage (Mather et al 2017). These data loosely constrain the 580 • C isotherm and the integrated heat production in sparsely distributed localities for Curie depth and heat flow data, respectively.…”
Section: I M I Tat I O N S a N D F U T U R E D I R E C T I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%