Curiosity and medical education

Abstract

CONTEXT For doctors, curiosity is fundamental to understanding each patient's unique experience of illness, building respectful relationships with patients, deepening self-awareness, supporting clinical reasoning, avoiding premature closure and encouraging lifelong learning. Yet, curiosity has received limited attention in medical education and research, and studies from the fields of cognitive psychology and education suggest that common practices in medical education may inadvertently suppress curiosity.OBJECTIVES This study aimed to identify common barriers to and facilitators of curiosity and related habits of mind in the education of doctors. METHODSWe conducted a theory-driven conceptual exploration and qualitative review of the literature.RESULTS Curiosity is related to inquisitiveness, reflection and mindfulness. Instructional practices can suppress curiosity by confusing haste with efficiency, neglecting negative emotions, promoting overconfidence and using teaching approaches that encourage passive learning. Curiosity tends to flourish in educational environments that promote the student's responsibility for his or her own learning, multiple perspectives and mindful reflection on both the subject and the learning process. Specific educational strategies that can support curiosity in classroom and clinical settings include the mindful pacing of teaching, modelling effective management of emotions, confronting uncertainty and overconfidence, using inquiry-based learning, helping students see familiar situations as novel, simultaneously considering multiple perspectives, and maximising the value of small-group discussions. Instructor attributes that contribute to the development of student curiosity include patience, a habit of inquiry, emotional candour, intellectual humility, transparency and recognition of the benefits to be gained in learning from peers.CONCLUSIONS Curiosity, inquisitiveness and related habits of mind can be supported in medical education through specific, evidence-based instructional approaches. Medical educators should balance the teaching of facts, techniques and protocols with approaches that help students cultivate and sustain curiosity and wonder in the context-rich, often ambiguous world of clinical medicine.the cross-cutting edge

Mindfulness and professional practice: a generative dialogue

“…However, by failing to acknowledge emotions, which invariably exist, clinicians run the risk of blindly reacting to emotions. Recent commentary demonstrates that failing to acknowledge emotion in clinical life may in fact interfere with rational thinking (Dyche & Epstein, 2011). Further, Peloquin (2005) warned that clinicians may experience de-personalization and decreased job satisfaction when emotions are overlooked.…”

Core Concepts in Remediation: Lessons Learned from a 6-Year Case Study

“…The primary locus of change is the learners themselves, and successful remediation should support their affective, cognitive and metacognitive development. Failure has emotional and attitudinal consequences, and it is essential to engage with and explore these, while recognising that the goal is not to simply make the students feel better about themselves, but to encourage reflection, to (re)kindle their curiosity, intrinsic motivation and desire to learn [16,17]. At the same time, their cognition, their capacity for critical thinking, needs to be nurtured.…”

Fostering Student Engagement in Medical Humanities Courses

“…The most important link between the cognitive and affective arguments is curiosity. Curiosity is linked intimately on the one hand with wonder, aesthetics, and discovery and, on the other hand, with empathy [5]. The more curious we are about other people's experiences, the better able we are to empathize, and the more we empathize, the more we want to learn how to help our patients achieve better health outcomes.…”